Out
Of The shadows: Israel's
Minister Of Strategic Threats
By Jonathan Cook in Nazareth
26 October, 2006
Countercurrents.org
The furore that briefly flared
this week at the decision of Israel’s Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert,
to invite Avigdor Lieberman and his Yisrael Beiteinu party into the
government coalition is revealing, but not in the way most observers
assume.
Lieberman, a Russian immigrant, is every bit the populist and racist
politician he is portrayed as being. Like many of his fellow politicians,
he harbours a strong desire to see the Palestinians of the occupied
territories expelled, ideally to neighbouring Arab states or Europe.
Lieberman, however, is more outspoken than most in publicly advocating
for this position.
Where he is seen as overstepping the mark is in arguing that the state
should strip up to a quarter of a million Palestinians living inside
Israel of their citizenship and seal them and their homes into the Palestinian
ghettoes being created inside the West Bank (presumably in preparation
for the moment when they will all be expelled to Jordan). He believes
any remaining Arab citizens should be required to sign a loyalty oath
to Israel as a “Jewish and democratic state” -- loyalty
to a democratic state alone will not suffice. Any who refuse will be
physically expelled from Israel.
And, as a coup de grace, he has recently demanded the execution for
treason of any Arab parliamentarian who talks to the Palestinian leadership
in the occupied territories or commemorates Nakba Day, which marks the
expulsion and permanent dispossession of the Palestinian people in 1948.
That would include every elected representative of Israel’s Arab
population.
These are Lieberman’s official positions. Apparently unofficially
he wants even worse measures taken against Palestinians, both inside
Israel and in the occupied territories. In May 2004, for example, he
told a crowd of his supporters, in Russian, that 90 per cent of the
country’s Arab citizens should be expelled. “They have no
place here. They can take their bundles and get lost.” His speech
could have had second billing with one by Adolf Hitler at a Nuremberg
Rally.
Despite Lieberman’s well-known political platform, Olmert has
been courting him ever since Yisrael Beiteinu (Israel is Our Home) upset
the expected three-way struggle between Olmert’s Kadima party,
Labor and Likud in the March elections. Lieberman romped home with 11
seats in the 120-member Knesset, making his party a sparring partner
of both Likud and the popular religious fundamentalist party Shas.
According to reports in the Israeli media, Lieberman has not joined
the coalition until now because he has been playing hard to get, making
increasing demands of Olmert before agreeing to sign up for the government.
His hand has grown stronger too: according to opinion polls, he is now
the most popular politician in Israel after Binyamin Netanyahu, leader
of the Likud party.
In the newly established post of Minister for Strategic Threats, Lieberman
-- the self-avowed Arab hater -- will shape Israel’s response
to Iran, leading the chorus threats being made by Israel that it is
only a hair’s breadth from dropping bombs, possibly nuclear warheads,
on Tehran. After that, he will presumably help the government decide
what other “strategic threats” it faces.
While Olmert enthuses over Lieberman, most in the Labor party seem quietly
resigned to his inclusion. Labor’s elder statesman and former
leader, Shimon Peres, says he has no objections, so long as Lieberman
does not challenge the core policies agreed by Kadima and Labor. This,
of course, is precisely what Lieberman is doing -- it was the price
of the bargain he struck with Olmert. Lieberman wants no peace overtures
to the Palestinians, and favours the hardline neoliberal economic policies
pursued by Kadima.
On Wednesday the Labor leader Amir Peretz, a supposed socialist and
former head of the Israeli trade union movement, accepted Lieberman’s
entry to the coalition, as Olmert surely knew he would. In typical Labor
style, Peretz bought off his conscience by insisting on a package of
modest benefits for Arab citizens, the same Arab citizens Lieberman
wants expelled. The last time the government made a similar promise
to its Arab minority back in late 2001 -- when the prime minister of
the day, Ehud Barak, needed their votes -- the $4 million pledge was
broken immediately after the election.
So why are Israel’s politicians, of the left and right, so comfortable
sitting with Lieberman, the leader of Israel’s only unquestionably
fascist party? Because, in truth, Lieberman is not the maverick politician
of popular imagination, even if he is every bit the racist -- a Jewish
Jorg Haider or Jean Marie Le Pen.
In reality, Lieberman is entirely a creature of the Israeli political
establishment, his policies sinister reflections of the principles and
ideas he learnt in the inner sanctums of the Likud party, a young hopeful
immigrant rubbing shoulders with the likes of Ariel Sharon, Binyamin
Netanyahu and, of course, Ehud Olmert.
From their political infancy, the latter three were schooled in the
minor arts of Israeli diplomacy: feel free to speak plainly in the womb
of the party; speak firmly but cautiously in Hebrew to other Israelis;
and speak in another tongue entirely when using English, the language
of the goyim, the non-Jews.
But Lieberman, who arrived in Israel as a 21-year-old immigrant, was
not around for those lessons. He imbibed nothing of the principles of
“hasbara”, the “advocacy for Israel” industry
that has its unpaid battalions of propagandists regularly assaulting
the phone lines and email inboxes of the Western media. He tells it
exactly as he sees it, even if mostly in Russian.
Inside the Likud party, his political training ground, that hardly mattered.
He rapidly rose through the ranks to become director-general of Likud
from 1993-96 and soon afterwards to head the office of Prime Minister
Binyamin Netanyahu. For many years he was the darling of the Likud,
a party that today exists in two halves: its original incarnation, once
again led by Netanyahu; and the renovated, sleeker model, Kadima, founded
by Sharon.
But it was in breaking from Likud and founding his own party, Yisrael
Beiteinu, in 1999 that Lieberman finally found his voice outside the
Likud’s smoke-filled rooms. The audience for his message was as
untutored in the deceits of Israeli politicking as Lieberman himself.
Lieberman immigrated to Israel from Moldova in 1978, leading the vanguard
of a wave of immigration from Russia and its satellite states that reached
a peak in the early 1990s as the Soviet empire broke up. By the time
most Russian speakers began pouring into Israel, Lieberman was already
well ensconced in the Israeli political system.
Yisrael Beiteinu’s openly racist agenda spoke to the darkest instincts
of the one million newly arrived Russian speakers.
Many of them poor and struggling to adapt to Israeli culture, they live
far from the prosperous centre of the country in their own neglected
ghettos, Little Moscows, where the signs and street language are more
than a decade later still in Russian. They feel little affinity for
the Jewish state -- apart from a loathing for everything Arab.
The state has found it easy to manipulate these immigrants’ emotions.
They have little understanding of the historic reasons for Israel’s
conflict with the Palestinians, and like other Israelis learn almost
nothing more at school. With no context for appreciating why the Palestinians
might carry out suicide attacks, Russian speakers assume the Palestinians
are simply the hate-filled barbarians described to them by their politicians.
When young Russian men do three years of active duty in the occupied
territories, all these prejudicies are confirmed. One of the largest
blocs of Israel’s citizen army, the Russians are assigned some
of the toughest spots in the West Bank and Gaza, often their first experience
of meeting “Arabs”.
When they return home, they find it hard to make sense of Israeli officialdom’s
lip service in distinguishing between Arab citizens, who have some rights
in the Jewish state, and the “Arabs” of the occupied territories,
who have none. Many Russian speakers wonder why Israel does not simply
kill or expel the lot of them.
And this is where Lieberman steps in. Because usefully this is exactly
what he not only believes but also openly declares. Lieberman can tap
the support of nearly a million voters, a huge reservoir of support
for any prime ministerial hopeful trying to assemble the coalition needed
to form a government under the fractious Israeli political system.
Neither Olmert nor Netanyahu can afford to say what is really on their
minds: that they want to cleanse the region of as many Palestinians
as they can manage -- most certainly those in the occupied territories,
and later the even bigger nuisance of the ones who have citizenship
and undermine Israel’s Jewishness.
But instead they can let a Lieberman, the charismatic leader of a popular
party who does dare to say these things, join the government with minimal
damage to their own reputations.
They can also let him use the platform provided by a cabinet position
to shape a new coarser political language in which ideas of expulsion
and transfer become ever more mainstream. Until one day the policies
Lieberman advocates, reflections of the values he imbibed during his
long years spent in Likud, become acceptable enough that a Prime Minister
-- Olmert or Netanyahu or Lieberman himself -- will be able to put them
in the government’s programme.
Instead of using words like “disengagement”, “convergence”
or “realignment”, Israel’s politicians of the near
future may simply call for the expulsion of Arabs, all Arabs.
Even now they do little to conceal the fact that such thoughts are uppermost
in their minds. Netanyahu, currently Israel’s most popular politician
and the leader of the opposition, has repeatedly called the 1.2 million
Arab citizens of the country a “demographic timebomb”. Back
in 2002, for example, he told an audience of policymakers: “If
there is a demographic problem, and there is, it is with the Israeli
Arabs who will remain Israeli citizens … We therefore need a policy
that will first of all guarantee a Jewish majority.”
Unlike Lieberman, Netanyahu never spells out what policies he is advocating.
But most Israelis understand that in practice, if he felt free to speak
his mind, his platform would not look much different from Yisrael Beiteinu’s.
Olmert too uses code words readily understood by his Israeli audiences.
In late 2004, in an interview with the Haaretz newspaper, he said: “There
is no doubt in my mind that very soon the government of Israel is going
to have to address the demographic issue with the utmost seriousness
and resolve. This issue above all others will dictate the solution that
we must adopt.” He added that he feared the Palestinians would
soon be a majority in the area comprising both the occupied territories
and Israel, and that then they could launch a “dangerous”
struggle for “one-man-one-vote” similar to the one against
apartheid in South Africa. He concluded: “For us, it would mean
the end of the Jewish state.”
What “solution” was Olmert referring to? Israelis know only
too well. Every year since 2000 Olmert, Netanyahu, Peres and other senior
policymakers have been meeting at the Herzliya conference, near Tel
Aviv, to draw up ideas about how to deal with the demographic threat:
the rapidly approaching moment when the Palestinians, either those with
Israeli citizenship or the non-citizens living under military occupation
in the West Bank and Gaza, will outnumber Jews.
The solutions they have proposed have been similar to Lieberman’s.
Both the disengagement from Gaza and the planned limited withdrawals
from the West Bank came out of Herzliya. But so did a range of measures
to deal with the country’s Arab citizens: land swaps to lose areas
of Israel densely populated with Arabs in return for the settlements
in the West Bank; loyalty oaths as a condition of citizenship; stripping
the Arab population of their right to vote; and forcing all political
parties to subscribe to Zionist ideals.
These are not fanciful ideas; they are now firmly in the mainstream.
Israel already has legislation requiring all parties running for the
Knesset to support Israel remaining a “Jewish and democratic state”.
Technically, the only non-Zionist parties -- two Arab parties and the
small joint Jewish and Arab Communist party -- could quite legally be
disqualified from all general elections under the current legislation.
They expect that at some point in the near future they will be too.
The two previous prime ministers, Ehud Barak and Ariel Sharon, both
secretly favoured land swaps in which large numbers of Arab citizens
would be removed from the Jewish state. Barak proposed such a scheme
at Camp David in the summer of 2000, as several participants later confirmed.
And in February 2004 Sharon floated the same idea during an interview
in the Maariv newspaper. When it caused a storm, he backtracked, but
investigations by the paper revealed that he had been formulating a
land swap for some time with his advisers and had even consulted the
then Labor leader and his foreign minister, Shimon Peres, on its feasibility.
At the top of Lieberman’s list of demands before agreeing to enter
Olmert’s coalition are major changes to Israel’s constitution,
including the introduction of a presidential system to replace the current
parliamentary system. Israel already has a President, currently Moshe
Katsav, who is facing a string of rape and sexual harassment allegations,
but the post is entirely symbolic.
Lieberman wants a president who has the authority to make major legislative
changes, even constitutional ones, without having to make the backroom
compromises to keep together the coalition governments that characterise
Israel’s current political system. The president Lieberman has
in mind would be more on the lines of an autocratic ruler.
Olmert is apparently sympathetic to Lieberman’s plans to change
the political system. It is not difficult to understand why.
Jonathan Cook is a writer and journalist based in Nazareth,
Israel. His book “Blood and Religion: The Unmasking of the Jewish
and Democratic State” is published by Pluto Press. His website
is www.jkcook.net
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights