Putting
Your Foot Into Your Mouth!
By Firdous Syed
10 August, 2007
Countercurrents.org
The
growing incidents of heinous crimes against women in Kashmir irrespective
of intent and origin are not only a worrisome factor but a matter of
grave concern for the whole society. The recent barbarous murder of
a fourteen year old girl of Batapora, Langate in Kupwara district has
shocked one and all. Tabinda Gani's rape and subsequent murder evoked
sharp reactions and widespread condemnation from all quarters of the
society. Though perceptibly a swift action by the police in apprehending
the culprits helped to cool down the tempers of the agitating masses
of the vicinity, but people will like to see a swift disposal of the
case. The culprits need to be punished adequately and justice delivered
speedily to act as an effective deterrence against the criminal elements
in the future. While people were busy pressing for a speedy trail to
punish the guilty, this dreadful incident was politicized thus generating
another controversy.
The presence of two nonlocals
among the four accused arrested raked up a different kind of issue.
The migrant labourers were blamed for the rising crime graph of the
valley. Some even went to the extent of viewing it as a concerted effort
and design by Indian agencies to push the criminal elements into the
valley to morally corrupt and criminalise the young generation here.
Addressing a public meeting at Langate in Kupwara district on Tuesday
the 24th of July, Syed Ali Shah Geelani said "majority of non-state
subjects were professional criminals and they should be driven out of
Kashmir in a civilised and dignified manner". As if taking a cue,
militant organisations also joined the fray, and taking a step further,
issued dead-lines and ultimatums to the migrant labourers to leave Kashmir.
Some of these groups even advised the local population that, "Who
have rented out accommodation to non-State Subjects, to see them off
in a decent way and thus help in the eviction of outsiders from the
Kashmir valley".
Although, after few days
seemingly some good senses prevailed, Syed Ali Geelani, clarified, that,
"only those non-locals who have criminal background and indulge
in anti social activates should leave the valley" and militant
organisation Hizbul Mujahideen, denied that "it has served an ultimatum
to non-local labourers to leave the valley within a week," "only
criminal elements among the non-locals would have to leave". But
this in the end proves to be a kind of adding absurdity to the whole
issue. Who will "separate chaff from the wheat"? How is it
possible to distinguish a criminal among the tens of thousands of non-local
labour working here in the valley? And moreover qualification or no
qualification, the damage has been done and atmosphere stands vitiated
to a great extend.
This is not the first time
that the hard line separatist leadership by speaking illogically has
put its foot in its mouth. On several occasions in the past also, the
myopic and short sighted approach of a section of the separatist amalgam
(that includes militant factions) has given bad name to the "Rights
Movement" but this time around their off the cuff knee jerk reaction
to a multi facet problem has put whole of Kashmir under a scanner.
There are several issues
involved; first and foremost it is simple question of economics of "Demand
and Supply". Supply is subservient to demand only and if there
is demand it necessitates supply. Be it for the reason that Kashmiri
youth has acquired some education and is inclined towards white collar
job rather than a blue collar one or society has gained a relative degree
of prosperity that it can not meet the growing demand of labour to keep
pace with its developmental activities. Whether it is supply deficit
or Kashmiri's are unwilling to do the menial job any more, Kashmir's
economy is almost dependent upon the out side labour. Contrary to the
popular perception that only construction activity is dependent upon
the outside work force, in every field, be it agriculture, horticulture,
tourism industry etc skilled or semi skilled outside labour is needed
to keep the things moving. It is not only the industrial labour that
is required to maintain a level of productivity, Kashmir even imports
its barbers, sweet shop owners and even sweepers and broom makers from
other states of India. With such a huge influx of labour from outside
none can dispute the entry of some unwanted and anti social elements
into the valley. But to term the all labour class as criminal will not
only be a sheer exaggeration but also gross miss-representation of facts.
If Kashmir today is prepared to do its scavenging and menial job's,
it shall automatically dry the demand for the out side labour. We all
know as a matter of fact it is not.
If it is not dichotomy then
what is it ? Driven by hate and petty political considerations the life
long preachers of universal Islamic appeal and social justice have turned
into 'ultra nationalists' and 'Theo- fascist's'. Kashmir people have
a beef against State and its wrong polices and not against people of
India. It may seem a paradox, but it is a realty that poor people of
India too are worst suffers of the wrong polices of their rulers that
pushes them towards economic migration in search of employment. A criminal
act of an individual can not and should not be reflective of the entire
labour class here; one can not paint the whole body of people with a
single stroke of brush. Then with such a stretch of imagination all
the Muslim will have to leave Europe and America for a single act of
terrorism by a member of the Muslim community, thousands of Kashmiri's
working and studying out side Kashmir have to be prepared to get back
home soon, as a single act of violence in India by a Kashmiri militant
can bring worst kind of reprisals to the all Kashmiri Muslims living
out side Kashmir. This behaviour can not be representative of a Rights
Movement; it is simple madness.
During the first years of
Bush Presidency, an American top level intellectual while on a visit
to India was asked during a TV interview by an Indian Journalist, to
explain a difference between President Clinton and President Bush's
policy on Kashmir. His reply was "in President Clinton's time Kashmir
was seen as a problem related to rights, and now it is viewed as a problem
associated with terrorism." The changed geo politics and events
after 9/11 might have contributed in building present policy of Bush
Administration towards Kashmir, but there can not be denial to the fact
that the irresponsible behaviour of a section of the separatist leadership
has also contributed in building of such an international opinion towards
the Kashmir problem. The separatist leadership should ponder over and
decide that, by such actions whose cause they are serving. One can tell
from a distance that at least not of a genuine rights movement.
Tailpiece: Hazrat Ali, the
fourth caliph the first among the companions, cousin, and son in law
of the Prophet of Islam is known for his legendry sense of Justice.
Hazrat Ali was killed by Ibn Muljam al-Muradi in the wee hours of 19th
of Ramdhan at Kofa in Iraq. The day before the incident Ibn Muljam was
seen sharpening the blade of his sword and loudly speaking to his sword
to get sharpened so that it be able to cut the neck of Ali the next
day. This incident was reported to fourth caliph with a request to take
action against Ibn Muljam. Hazrat Ali's profound reply shall remain
to be a guiding principal and corner stone of the criminal justice system.
He said: "How can I kill somebody on the basis of intent rather
than an offence he has not committed wherein he has not killed me yet."
In natural law of justice punishment can not be awarded on the basis
of mere intent and it can not be pre-emptive rather.
(The writer is based at Srinagar,
Kashmir, writes regularly for national and local newspapers, can be
contacted at firdoussyed@
yahoo.com).
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights
Comment
Policy
Digg
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.