In applying its community standards, Facebook frequently conflates anti-Zionist attacks with anti-Semitism.  A case in point is a post for which I have just been put in Facebook jail (i.e., blocked from posting for 30 days).  The post says,

“#Hillel, a racist organization, has as much place on university campuses as does the #KKK.”

Facebook Hillel post we removed

And Facebook removed it, saying: “We remove posts that attack people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, gender or disability.”

This is wrong, not just because, obviously, Hillel is not “a people”, but also because Hillel is, without a doubt, a Zionist organization, and Zionism is racism – see ESCWA report on Israel’s Apartheid.

Hillel is billed as “introducing students to Jewish life”, but its core mission is to link Jewish students’ identities with Israel, regardless of their American (or other) nationality. ‘Tufts University Disorientation Guide’, for example, called Hillel a “Zionist space” and accused it of

“exploit(ing) black voices for their own pro-Israel agenda.”

But such revelations are quickly censored for fear of offending the “Jewish community”. Tuft’s Disorientation University Guide is no longer online.

University administrators, and not just Facebook, also conflate Zionism with Judaism, President of San Francisco State University (SFSU) Leslie E. Wong has recently written in an e-mail:

“I want to sincerely apologize for the hurt feelings and anguish my words have caused [members of the SF State Hillel student community]. Let me be clear: Zionists are welcome on our campus.”

A move to reform Hillel’s approach to Jewishness has not yet made much inroads.

“Some two years after the Open Hillel movement emerged to challenge Hillel International’s guidelines for Israel activities, which prohibit campus chapters from hosting speakers that support divestment from Israel or deny its right to exist, the organization is under fire again for toeing a line on Israel that some see as alienating to liberal Jewish students.”

The paradoxical situation today is that Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) continues to be attacked as a racist organizationby both Jewish Zionist organizations and university administrations, because it bucks the status quo on Israel, while Hillel, an international organization on university campuses that is widely perceived as Jewish but is in fact a racist Zionist organization, gets a pass.

SJP is a movement that came into prominence, as Ali Abunimah documents in The Battle for Justice in Palestine: The Case for a Single Democratic State in Palestine (2014), after the collapse of the so-called “two-state solution” in response to the escalating problem of the partitioning of Palestine in 1948. As Columbia University MESAAS professor Joseph Massad wrote about this book:

“the struggle for justice in Palestine is at a crossroads. As Israel and its advocates lurch toward greater extremism, many ask where the struggle is headed.”

The most popular attack against pro-Palestine activists in academia and elsewhere is the accusation of racism – specifically anti-Semitism. (See “the chairperson of Labour Friends of Israel falsely claiming a Palestine Solidarity Campaign supporter had abused her with anti-Semitism.”)

A lot has been written about this Zionist tactic of attack, but the understanding now is that it stems from

“conflating Israel with Jews [which] is wrong, and … it’s sometimes Israeli leaders who do this conflating.”

A familiar hasbara tactic is turning the victims of Israel’s oppression and dispossession into victimizers. Every aspect of the Palestinian tragedy has been up-ended in this way, most blatantly in the charges of racism such organizations bring against SJP as a campus group.

White nationalists and white supremacists who appear on campuses, on the other hand, are quickly spotted as groups with a racist agenda:

“An old and familiar poison is being spread on college campuses these days: the idea that America should be a country for white people.

“Under the banner of the Alternative Right – or ‘alt-right’ – extremist speakers are touring colleges and universities across the country to recruit students to their brand of bigotry, often igniting protests and making national headlines. Their appearances have inspired a fierce debate over free speech and the direction of the country.”

Increasingly, social justice activism on campuses is organized, as on the Purduecampus, in coalitions:

“Purdue Social Justice Coalition is a community of students, faculty and staff of Purdue University, along with workers and citizens in Lafayette/West Lafayette who volunteer their time to make the university and city-wide community more progressive and accountable to social justice issues regionally, nationally and internationally.”

This opens a space that approaches activism against social injustice on campuses in a global, intersectional perspective.

Illustrating this concept on his blog Resist News , Purdue University professor Bill Mullen, who has himself been the subject of a smear campaign for acting as an adviser to the SJP group on his campus, quotes the Palestinian writer Ghassan Kanafani:

“‘Everything in this world can be robbed and stolen, except one thing; this one thing is the love that emanates from a human being towards a solid commitment to a conviction or cause.’ …This site takes its impetus, its hope, from those pushing back collectively against all varieties of exploitation and oppression.”

Ghassan Kanafani also said:

“The Palestinian cause is not a cause for Palestinians only, but a cause for every revolutionary, wherever he is.”

The best antidote to intolerance of any kind on American campuses is such collective activism, work that refuses to exclude activism for Palestine.

Rima Najjar is a Palestinian whose father’s side of the family comes from the forcibly depopulated village of Lifta on the western outskirts of Jerusalem. She is an activist, researcher and retired professor of English literature, Al-Quds University, occupied West Bank.

Countercurrents is answerable only to our readers. Support honest journalism because we have no PLANET B. Become a Patron at Patreon Subscribe to our Telegram channel




  1. Bob Stuart says:

    Another reason to not waste time or data on Facebonk. Revive the alternatives.

  2. Dr Gideon Polya says:

    Orthodox Judaism holds that Jews can only return to Zion (Jerusalem) after the Messiah arrives to reveal the glory of the Lord to all Humanity – and accordingly utterly rejects Zionism. Zionism is genocidal racism in awful theory and appalling, intentional genocidal practice – 90% of Palestine has now been intentionally ethnically cleansed of Indigenous Palestinians by the racist Zionists. Thus founder of Zionism, racist psychopath Theodor Herzel (1895): ““We shall try to spirit the penniless [Palestinian] population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it employment in our country. The property owners will come over to our side. Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discretely and circumspectly” and serial war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu (Israeli Prime Minister 1996 – 1999 and 2009-present) (1989): “Israel should have exploited the repression of the demonstrations in China, when world attention focused on that country, to carry out mass expulsions among the Arabs of the territories” (see Gideon Polya, “Zionist quotes reveal genocidal racism”, MWC News, 12 January 2018: ).

    Facebook is evidently fervently pro-Zionist – 5 out of 10 Facebook Board Members are Jewish, this including 2 Jewish Israelis. Ditto Google which according to The Zog: “Of the six (6) Google executive officers, five (5) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 83%. Of the ten (10) Google directors, five (5) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 50%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population”. Both Facebook and Google are major media organizations but egregiously censor in the interests of Zionism, Apartheid Israel and the Zionist-dominated neoliberal Establishment. Free speech is vital for neoliberal-threatened Humanity which must urge and apply Boycotts, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) against Apartheid Israel and all its supporters (see Gideon Polya, “Google censorship & Zionist constraint on effective free speech threaten planet”, Countercurrents, 9 August 2017: ; Gideon Polya, “Palestinian Me Too: 140 alphabetically-listed Zionist crimes expose Western complicity & hypocrisy”, Countercurrents, 7 February 2018: ; “Boycott Apartheid Israel”: ).