Do Bing Searches To Circumvent Mendacious Pro-Zionist Google Censorship – Bing It!

google dont be evil

Western Mainstream media are dominated by Jewish and non-Jewish Zionists with few more so than Google or its holding company Alphabet  that is the world’s number 1 media company as compared to number 17 Microsoft that owns Bing. Bing Searches involving key terms are much more  successful than Google Searches ranking-wise in detecting  some key  websites documenting humane opinion about Zionist crimes –  most are variously absent or effectively invisible when one does Google Searches for key terms. Ergo, do Bing Searches to circumvent  pro-Zionist Google censorship. Bing it!

While numerous anti-racist  Jewish intellectuals and humanitarians are resolutely  critical  of the  ongoing Palestinian Genocide, Western Mainstream media variously  censor  or white-wash  the nuclear terrorist, genocidally racist, and grossly human rights-abusing conduct of democracy-by-genocide Apartheid Israel.  A significant part of the explanation for this huge moral perversion is that the American 60% of the world’s 30 biggest media companies [1] have a disproportionately high  Jewish Board membership. Jews and females represent 2% and 51%, respectively, of the US population but average 33% and 19%, respectively, of Board members of the top 18 US media companies [2]. It is a reasonable assumption that extremely wealthy Jews would be very likely to be pro-Zionist, in contrast to poor Jews or modestly prosperous intellectual Jews who would be more likely in comparison to be anti-racist and thus anti-Zionist.

The Alternative medium The Zog has summarized  a detailed analysis  of the top executives of Google thus: “Of the six (6) Google executive officers, five (5) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 83%. Of the ten (10) Google directors, five (5) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 50%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population. Therefore Jews are over-represented among the Google executive officers by a factor of 41.5 times (4,150 percent) and overrepresented on the Google board of directors by a factor of 25 times (2,500 percent)” [2]. There is growing indignation from anti-racist Jewish people over the human  rights-abusing and genocidal policies of Apartheid Israel. If we generously assume that only 50% of these Jewish Google executives are Zionists there is still a hugely disproportionate  Zionist representation.

Alphabet, the holding company that owns Google, had an annual $59.62 billion in revenue in 2015 and was a world leader among media companies.  46% of Alphabet  Directors are Jewish or have Jewish spouses but only 23% of Board members are women.  Alphabet chairman John Hennessy is anti-BDS (opposed to Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions against Apartheid Israel) and hence pro-Zionist [2]. In addition to minimizing the humane Left, Google provides software to identify targets for  illegal US drone strikes [4].

The   World Socialist Web Site (WSWS) has quantified how Google has altered search protocols to effectively limit reader access to progressive, Left, socialist , anti-war and pro-humanity sites [5]. However Google is not alone in this surreptitious perversion of free speech and effective free speech. Thus  Chris Hedges of Truthdig recently reported that “Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, along with 18 members of the House of Representatives—15 Republicans and three Democrats—has sent a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions demanding that the Qatari-run Al-Jazeera television network register as a foreign agent under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). The letter was issued after Al-Jazeera said it planned to air a documentary by a reporter who went undercover to look into the Israel lobby in the United States. The action by the senator and the House members follows the decision by the Justice Department to force RT America  to register as a foreign agent and the imposition of algorithms by Facebook, Google and Twitter that steer traffic away from left-wing, anti-war and progressive websites, including Truthdig. It also follows December’s abolition of net neutrality” [6]. Google is variously rendering progressive sites invisible or effectively invisible from Google Searches [2-12]

By way of comparison with Alphabet (owner of Google) that is #1 in the  global Mainstream media, Microsoft ($4.58 billion annual revenue) is  #17 in the world Mainstream media. Among other things Microsoft owns the search engine Bing and  has an 18% Jewish Board and an 18% female Board [2] as compared to a 46% Jewish Board and 23% female Board for Alphabet. However a notable difference is that  Bing Searches reveal humane websites variously rendered effectively invisible by Google [2, 7-12].

Below are listed a number of websites I have created in the public interest that in an alphabetically-ordered fashion quote the considered, expert and humane opinions of numerous decent intellectuals about key matters relating to Apartheid Israel, the ongoing Palestinian Genocide  and the Zionist-promoted War on Terror. For each website I record the success of Google or Bing Searches for related key terms in bringing up the website.

  1. “Experts: US did 9-11” website.

According to the Center for Public Integrity, the Bush Administration told 935 lies about Iraq between 9-11 and the war criminal US Alliance invasion of Iraq that was based on false assertions of Iraqi possession of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) [13]. Iraqi deaths from this invasion and occupation totalled 2.7 million, this  comprising 1.5 million violent deaths and 1.2 million avoidable deaths from war-imposed deprivation [14] , an Iraqi Holocaust and Iraqi Genocide of the same order of magnitude as the WW2 Jewish Holocaust (5-6 million deaths from violence or deprivation) [15]. Yet the Western Mainstream media totally and blindly accept the “lying Bush official version of 9-11” and censor expert dissenters.  The “Experts: US did 9-11” website alphabetically  lists the opinions of numerous science, engineering, architecture,  aviation,  military and intelligence experts to the effect that the US did 9-11, with some asserting Israeli involvement  [16].

A Bing Search for the phrase “US did 9-11” yields the website “Experts: US did 9-11” as  #1 on page 1 out of 17.1 million results. In stark contrast, a Google Search for the phrase “US did 9-11” fails to come up with the  “Experts: US did 9-11” website in the first 12 pages of results (111 results). On the final page 12 of Google Search results one can click a link enabling one to  “repeat the search with the omitted results included”, this now yielding   the  “Experts: US did 9-11” website as #11 of the results and located on page 2. However, as observed by Steve Toth: “According to Search Engine Watch, 92% of search traffic comes from page 1” [17]. While a Bing Search of the  key phrase “US did 9-11” yields  the  “Experts: US did 9-11” website as #1 on page 1, this important  website is rendered effectively “invisible” by Google.

  1. “Jews against  racist Zionism” website.

The “Jews against  racist Zionism” website [18] alphabetically lists the opinions of numerous anti-racist Jews (most notably Nobel Laureate Albert Einstein) who are highly critical of the crimes of the racist Zionists and Apartheid Israel [18]. For anti-racist Jews and indeed all anti-racist humanitarians the core moral messages from the Jewish Holocaust (5-6 million dead, 1 in 6 dying from deprivation) [15] and from the more general WW2 European Holocaust (30 million Slav, Jewish and Gypsy dead) are “zero tolerance for racism”, “never again to anyone”, “bear witness” and “zero tolerance for lying”.

A Bing Search of the term “Jews against” yields the “Jews against  racist Zionism” website on page 1 as result #6 out of 239,000 results. Similarly, a Bing Search of the term “racist Zionism” yields the “Jews against racist Zionism” website as #1 on page 1 of 15,200 results. In stark contrast, a Google Search for “Jews against” yields zero (0) results out of the first 10 pages of 272,000 results. A Google Search for “racist Zionism” yielded zero result   in the first 21 pages but a  Google Search “with the omitted results included” yields the “Jews against  racist Zionism” website as #51 on page 5 out of 11,300 results. Astonishingly, a Google Search for “Jews against  racist Zionism” fails to pick up this particular Google site in 9 pages of 2,970 results but the same search  with “omitted results included” reveals this website as #3 on page 1 of 2,970 results. The burning of Jewish books by the Nazis was anti-Jewish anti-Semitism – what does one call rendering eminent, anti-racist Jewish opinion “invisible”?

  1. “Non-Jews against racist Zionism” website.

The “Non-Jews against racist Zionism” website is an alphabetical compendium of the views on racist Zionism by numerous eminent non-Jewish leaders and writers, including Nobel Laureates Jimmy Carter, Maired Maguire, Nelson Mandela, Jose Saramago, and Desmond Tutu [19].

A Bing Search for “Non-Jews against” yields the website as item #2 on page 1 out of 15,300 results. A Bing Search for “racist Zionism” yields the website as item #34  on page 4 out of 15,300 results. A Google Search for “Non-Jews against” yields “Non-Jews against racist Zionism” as #1 on page 1 out of 354 results, but a Google Search for “racist Zionism” fails to yield this website in the first 10 pages. A Google Search for “Jews against” yields this website as #75 (page 8 of 272,000 results). A Bing Search for “Non-Jews against racist Zionism” yields this website as #1 on page 1 of 1.81 million results, and a Google Search for “Non-Jews against racist Zionism” yields  the website as #1 on page 1 of 356 results.  However a Google Search for “Jews against racist Zionism” fails  pick up the  “Jews against racist Zionism” Google Site website in the first 9 pages – evidently the Google Robot is vastly more concerned  to censor Jewish rather than non-Jewish critics of racist Zionism and Apartheid Israel. Non-Jewish critics of Apartheid Israel can be much more plausibly falsely defamed as “anti-Semites” than anti-racist Jews.

  1. “Boycott Apartheid Israel” website.

The “Boycott Apartheid Israel” website is an alphabetically-organized  compendium of the opinions of outstanding, anti-racist, Jewish and non-Jewish  scholars and writers  who variously describe the State of Israel as a race-based  Apartheid state involved in a Palestinian Genocide.  The “Boycott Apartheid Israel” website also lists the views of those  supporting comprehensive intra-national and international Boycotts, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS)  against Apartheid Israel and its racist supporters as were successfully applied to US-, UK-, Apartheid Australia- and Apartheid Israel-backed  Apartheid South Africa and the individuals, corporations, organizations and countries who supported that egregiously racist, anti-African and anti-Asian White Minority regime [20].  Critically, one notes that BDS is a peaceful action after the fashion of Mahatma Gandhi’s non-violent Satyagraha movement, and that the UN Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid” (UN Apartheid Convention) and the UN General Assembly have labelled apartheid as a crime against humanity [20].  Apartheid Israel presently rules all of Palestine and determines that of its 6.8 million  Palestinian subjects (50% of the subject population) , 5 million or 74% of the Indigenous Palestinian subjects, are excluded from voting for the government ruling them i.e. explicit, sustained and egregious Apartheid [21-24].

A Bing Search for “Boycott Apartheid Israel” brings up the “Boycott Apartheid Israel” website as #3 on page 1 of 1.44 million results; a Bing Search for  “Boycott Apartheid” brings up the website as #7 on page 1 of 33,400 results; and a Bing Search for “Apartheid Israel” brings up the website as #67 on page 7 of 128,000 results. A Google Search for “Boycott Apartheid Israel” brings up the “Boycott Apartheid Israel” website as #5 on page 1 of 15,100 results; a Google Search for  “Boycott Apartheid” brings up the website as #46 on page 4 of 24,700 results; and a Google Search for “Apartheid Israel” fails  to elicit the website even with ““omitted results included”. Google has effectively made the “Boycott Apartheid Israel” website much less visible unless you know the exact name of the website. Many of the supporters of BDS are anti-racist Jews [20] and one must again pose the question: if the burning of Jewish books by the Nazis was anti-Jewish anti-Semitism,  what does one call rendering eminent, anti-racist Jewish opinion “invisible”?

  1. “Nuclear weapons ban, end poverty & reverse climate change” website.

The “Nuclear weapons ban, end poverty & reverse climate change” website exists because our world is acutely threatened by nuclear weapons, poverty and man climate change. Thus (1) a  comprehensive  Nuclear Weapons Ban is needed to avoid an accidental full-scale nuclear catastrophe and a consequent Nuclear Winter that will wipe out most of Humanity and the Biosphere; (2) we can and must urgently end poverty that causes 16 million avoidable deaths from deprivation each year; and (3) we must urgently reverse climate change by atmospheric CO2 draw-down to circa 300 ppm CO2 from the present dangerous and damaging 410 ppm CO2 that is increasing at about 3 ppm CO2 per year in a worsening Climate Emergency and Climate Genocide that, unaddressed, is  set to kill 10 billion people this century [25]. The “Nuclear weapons ban, end poverty & reverse climate change” website alphabetically lists expert opinion and national complicity.

Bing  Searches for (1) “Nuclear weapons ban” (2) “end poverty” and (3) “reverse climate change”, respectively, (1) yielded the website  as #51 (page 6 of 1.75 million results), (2) failed to elicit the website  in the first 10 pages, and (3) elicited the website as #48 (page 5 of 16.7 million results). In stark contrast, Google Searches for (1) “Nuclear weapons ban” (2) “end poverty” and (3) “reverse climate change”, respectively,  failed in all cases  to elicit this website in first 10 pages (100 results).  In the present racist Zionist context, one notes that Apartheid Israel has up to 400 nuclear warheads as compared to the  US (7,315), Russia (8,000), France (300), UK (250), China (250), Pakistan (120), India (100), North Korea (possibly 60), and Iran (zero). The vastly disproportionate Jewish Zionist influence in the US and Western US Alliance countries commenced in a big way in the late 1960s after Apartheid Israel became a nuclear terrorist country [25].

  1. “Stop state terrorism” website.

Non-state terrorism and state terrorism are both evil. Both state terrorism and non-state terrorism are utterly abhorrent to decent, pro-peace people. Connections between the twin evils of state crime, ( or state terrorism), and non-state terrorism are documented  in this  website  “Stop state terrorism” [26] and in the similarly  alphabetically-organized compendium website “State crime and non-state terrorism” [27]. While the evil of non-state terrorism has been largely successfully countered in Western countries by  top-down state action involving education, high technology intelligence, intra-national and international intelligence sharing, and skilled counter-terrorism forces, countering the vastly more deadly  evil of state terrorism requires peaceful, bottom-up action by billions of ordinary people world-wide.

Bing Searches for (1) “stop state terrorism” and (2) “state terrorism” yielded (1)  the website as #1 (page 1 of 306,000 results) and (2) #74 (page 8 of 326,000 results). In contrast, Google Searches for (1) “stop state terrorism” and (2) “state terrorism” yielded (1)  #1 as the “Stop state terrorism” website  (unsurprisingly #1 on page 1 of 8,500 results) and (2) zero results in the first 10 pages (100 results). In the 21st century Apartheid Israel arguably ranks  4th in the world after the US (#1), UK (#2) and France (#3) for deadly state terrorism but pro-Zionist Google ensures that people remain in the dark.

  1. “Palestinian Genocide” website.

The “Palestinian Genocide” website [28] alphabetically lists expert, humane, anti-racist opinion about this ongoing atrocity. For anti-racist Jews and indeed all anti-racist humanitarians the core moral messages from the Jewish Holocaust (5-6 million dead, 1 in 6 dying from deprivation) and from the more general WW2 European Holocaust (30 million Slav, Jewish and Gypsy dead) are “zero tolerance for racism”, “bear witness”, “zero tolerance for lying” and “never again to anyone”, anyone including the Indigenous Palestinian victims of the racist Zionist Palestinian Genocide  – 2 million Palestinians killed since the British invasion of Palestine , 0.1 million from violence, 1.9 million from war-, expulsion- and occupation-derived deprivation; 7 million Palestinian refugees; ethnic cleansing of Indigenous Palestinians from 90% of Palestine;  5 million Occupied Palestinians deprived of all the human rights listed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights ; over 7 million Palestinians forbidden to even live in the homeland continuously inhabited by their forbears to the very dawn of agrarian civilization; 5.0 million Palestinians (including 2.5  million children) confined without charge or trial to what the Catholic Church and many others have described as Israel’s Gaza Concentration Camp (2 million) or to West Bank ghettoes (3 million) for the asserted “crime” of being Indigenous Palestinians living in a tiny, remorselessly Zionist devastated residuum  of Palestine. It must be noted that Article 2 of the UN Genocide Convention defines genocide thus: “In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such: a) Killing members of the group; b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group” [29].

A Bing Search for “Palestinian Genocide” finds this website as #1 (page 1 of 36,900 results) whereas a Google Search for “Palestinian Genocide” finds this website as #20 (page 2 of 23,300 results). Bing or Google Searches for the terms “Palestinian” or “genocide” failed to elicit the website in the first 10 pages of results. Noting that 92% of search traffic comes from page 1 [17], Google greatly diminishes access to the “Palestinian Genocide” website.

  1. “Apartheid Israeli state terrorism” website.

The “Apartheid Israeli state terrorism” website [30] is  alphabetically-organized and  records (A) leaders, scholars and informed activists exposing Apartheid Israeli state terrorism, and (B) countries subject to Apartheid Israeli state terrorism. All those who   are party to non-state terrorism, state terrorism (e.g. US state terrorism, UK state terrorism, French state terrorism, Apartheid Israeli state terrorism and Australian state terrorism), war crimes, crimes against humanity  and genocide should be exposed, prosecuted and punished, whether by the International Criminal Court, by national legal systems or by non-government  tribunals of eminent scholars and jurists (any punishment in the latter case merely being the ignominy of public exposure).

Bing  Searches for (1) “Apartheid Israeli state terrorism” , (2) “Israeli state terrorism” and “state terrorism” yielded, respectively,  (1) unsurprisingly #1 on page 1 of 149,000 results for the website, (2)  zero result in the first 10 pages (100 results) of 2.58 million results, although it does come up with a copy of the website in question as #15 (page 2), and (3) zero results in the first 10 pages (100 results) of 669,000 results. Google Searches for (1) “Apartheid Israeli state terrorism” , (2) “Israeli state terrorism” and “state terrorism” yielded, respectively,  (1) unsurprisingly #1 on page 1 of 524 results for the website, (2)  zero result in the first 10 pages (100 results) of 12,800 results, although a copy of the website comes up as #21 (page 3 of 55,500 results) and (3) zero results in the first 10 pages (100 results) of 669,000 results. Not much difference between Bing and Google in this instance.

  1.  “Gaza Concentration Camp” website.

The “Gaza Concentration Camp” website  [31] exists to document the opinions of expert observers who correctly apply the descriptive “Gaza Concentration Camp” and like descriptives to the Gaza Strip  that contains 2 million Indigenous Palestinians (50% of them children, three quarters women and children) and is surrounded and cruelly blockaded by war criminal,  anti-Arab anti-Semitic,  anti-Jewish anti-Semitic,  Islamophobic and grossly human rights–abusing  Apartheid Israel and by similarly war criminal,  anti-Arab anti-Semitic,  Islamophobic and grossly human rights–abusing  military dictatorship  Egypt.

A Bing Search and a Google Search for the term “Gaza Concentration Camp” respectively  yield #4 (page 1 of 2.72 million results)   and #4 (page 1 of 16,900 results). No difference between Bing and Google in this instance

Concluding comments.

The present analysis reveals a huge difference in outcomes between Bing Searches and Google Searches for key terms relating to racist  Zionism, Apartheid Israel and the ongoing Palestinian Genocide. Of 9 websites considered, searches for the actual website name in inverted commas detects the website in all cases of Bing Searches but only in 8 out of 9 Google Searches – a Google Search for   “Jews against racist Zionism” is not successful in picking up this particular Google Site  [18] (although the Google Robot picks up an overlapping website of the same name).

Bing Searches using key phrases were much more successful than corresponding Google Searches in most cases in detecting the websites sought.  While there was little difference between Google and Bing in detecting the “Apartheid Israeli state terrorism” website and the “Gaza Concentration Camp” website by searching for the title, in  other cases the Google Search was variously inferior to a Bing Search.  Thus in an intermediate example, a Bing Search for “Palestinian Genocide” finds this website as #1 on page 1 of 36,900 results whereas a Google Search for “Palestinian Genocide” finds this website as #20 on page 2 of 23,300 results. However 92% of search traffic comes from page 1 [17], and thus Google greatly diminishes access to the “Palestinian Genocide” website.

People just do not  like being lied to and Trump’s assertions of “fake news” have found fertile ground in America.  However the reality is far, far worse than what has been asserted by the Mainstream media or by Donald Trump. Mainstream media lying occurs in 2 basic forms, lying by omission and lying by commission. Lying by omission is far, far worse than lying by commission because the latter can at least admit refutation and public debate. Western Mainstream media impose a huge burden of fake news on Western societies through entrenched and pervasive lying by omission [32-36]. Such lying by omission includes Search Engines operating under algorithms ensuring that a progressive website does not appear on page 1 of the Search results, this resulting in at least a  circa 10-fold diminution in visibility [18].

It is argued that in the looming  Age of Artificial Intelligence (AI), data represent the “new oil of the digital economy” [37]. The data of the world are increasingly in the hands of giant corporations such as Google and Facebook and this concentration of data and the anti-social abuses of evident corporate censorship by Google [2-12] and Facebook (e.g. see Professor Rima Najjar’s cogently argued complaint  [38]) make  a compelling case for the break-up of such mega-corporations,  democratization of information, rejection of censorship, and progression to more effective free speech for information-rich but resources-poor, visibility-poor and power-poor scientists and science-informed humanitarians.

With half the world’s wealth in the hands of One Percenters who also own the Mainstream media,  there is little prospect of immediate change to the insidious and dangerous current culture of fake news through lying by omission. Lying subverts science-based rational risk management that is crucial for societal and global  safety  and security [39]. However  people rich or poor don’t like being deceived, and informed by data such as that provided here, informed people can circumvent  pro-Zionist Google censorship by Binging instead of Googling – Bing it!

References.

[1]. Lara O’Reilly, “The 30 biggest media companies in the world” , Business Insider, 31 May 2016: http://www.businessinsider.com/the-30-biggest-media-owners-in-the-world-2016-5/?r=AU&IR=T .

[2]. Gideon Polya, “Zionist subversion, Mainstream media censorship”, Countercurrents, 9 March 2018: https://countercurrents.org/2018/03/09/zionist-subversion-mainstream-media-censorship-disproportionate-jewish-board-membership-of-us-media-companies/ .

[3]. “Who controls America? Who controls Google?”, The Zog: https://thezog.wordpress.com/who-controls-google/  .

[4]. Andre Damon, “Google admits collaboration with illegal US drone murder program”, Countercurrents, 8 March 2018: https://countercurrents.org/2018/03/08/google-admits-collaboration-with-illegal-us-drone-murder-program/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+countercurrents%2FeoKx+%28Countercurrents%29 .

[5]. WSWS, “Google’s new search protocol is restricting access to 13 leading socialist, progressive and anti-war sites”, WSWS, 2 August 2017: http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/08/02/pers-a02.html .

[6]. Chris Hedges, “Building the iron wall”, Truthdig,18 March 2018: https://www.truthdig.com/articles/building-the-iron-wall/ .

 

[7]. Gideon Polya, “Google censorship & Zionist constraint on effective free speech threaten planet”, Countercurrents, 9 August 2017: https://countercurrents.org/2017/08/09/google-censorship-zionist-constraint-on-effective-free-speech-threaten-planet/ .

[8]. “Censorship by Google”, Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_by_Google .

[9].Graham Vanbergen, “The Truth War is being lost to a global censorship apparatus called Google”, Global Research, 4 August 2017: http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-truth-war-is-being-lost-to-a-global-censorship-apparatus-called-google/5602578 .

[10]. Mick Meaney, “Google’s Censorship Of Independent News – Rinf Becomes Latest Victim”, RINF, 6 April 2017: http://rinf.com/alt-news/editorials/goolges-censorship-independent-news-begun/ .

[11]. Eric Zuesse, “Google now threatening Alt-news websites”, Off-Guardian, 21 April 2017: https://off-guardian.org/2017/04/21/google-now-threatening-alt-news-sites/ .

[12]. Robert Epstein, “The New Censorship. How did Google become the internet’s censor and master manipulator, blocking access to millions of websites?”, US News & World Report, 22 June 2016: https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2016-06-22/google-is-the-worlds-biggest-censor-and-its-power-must-be-regulated .

[13]. “Study: Bush, aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war”, CNN, 24 January 2008: http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/23/bush.iraq/ .

[14], “Iraqi Holocaust,  Iraqi Genocide”: https://sites.google.com/site/iraqiholocaustiraqigenocide/ .

[15]. Martin Gilbert “Atlas of the Holocaust”, Michael Joseph, London, 1982.

[16]. “Experts: US did 9-11” :  https://sites.google.com/site/expertsusdid911/ .

[17]. Steve Toth, “Help! I’m stuck on page 2 of Google Search results”, TechWyse, 19 October 2015: https://www.techwyse.com/blog/search-engine-optimization/stuck-on-page-2-of-google/ .

 

[18]. “Jews against racist Zionism”:  https://sites.google.com/site/jewsagainstracistzionism/ .

 

[19]. “Non-Jews against racist Zionism”: https://sites.google.com/site/nonjewsagainstracistzionism/ .

 

[20]. “Boycott Apartheid Israel”: https://sites.google.com/site/boycottapartheidisrael/ .

[21]. Gideon Polya, “Apartheid Israel’s Palestinian Genocide & Australia’s Aboriginal  Genocide compared”, Countercurrents, 20 February 2018: https://countercurrents.org/2018/02/20/apartheid-israels-palestinian-genocide-australias-aboriginal-genocide-compared/  .

[22]. Gideon Polya, “Israeli-Palestinian & Middle East conflict – from oil to climate genocide”, Countercurrents, 21 August 2017: https://countercurrents.org/2017/08/21/israeli-palestinian-middle-east-conflict-from-oil-to-climate-genocide/ .

[23]. Gideon Polya, “End 50 Years Of Genocidal Occupation & Human Rights Abuse By US-Backed Apartheid Israel”, Countercurrents,  9 June  2017: https://countercurrents.org/2017/06/09/end-50-years-of-genocidal-occupation-human-rights-abuse-by-us-backed-apartheid-israel/ .

[24]. Gideon Polya, “Universal Declaration of Human Rights & Palestinians. Apartheid Israel violates ALL Palestinian Human Rights”, Palestine Genocide Essays, 24 January 2009: https://sites.google.com/site/palestinegenocideessays/universal-declaration-of-human-rights-palestinians .

 

[25]. “Nuclear weapons ban, end poverty & reverse climate change”: https://sites.google.com/site/300orgsite/nuclear-weapons-ban .

 

[26]. “Stop state terrorism” : https://sites.google.com/site/stopstateterrorism/ .

 

[27]. “State crime and non-state terrorism” : https://sites.google.com/site/statecrimeandnonstateterrorism/  .

[28]. “Palestinian Genocide”: https://sites.google.com/site/palestiniangenocide/ .

[29]. Article 2 of the UN Genocide Convention: http://www.edwebproject.org/sideshow/genocide/convention.html .

[30]. “Apartheid Israeli state terrorism”: https://sites.google.com/site/palestiniangenocide/apartheid-israeli-state-terrorism .

 

[31].  “Gaza Concentration Camp”: https://sites.google.com/site/palestiniangenocide/gaza-concentration .

[32]. Gideon Polya, “Mainstream media fake news through lying by omission”, Global Research, 1 April 2017: http://www.globalresearch.ca/mainstream-media-fake-news-through-lying-by-omission/5582944 .

[33]. Gideon Polya, “Australian ABC and UK BBC fake news through lying by omission”, Countercurrents, 2 May 2017: https://countercurrents.org/2017/05/02/australian-abc-and-uk-bbc-fake-news-through-lying-by-omission/ .

[34]. “Lying by omission is worse than lying by commission because at least the latter permits refutation and public debate”, Mainstream media lying: https://sites.google.com/site/mainstreammedialying/lying-by-omission .

[35]. “Mainstream media censorship”; https://sites.google.com/site/mainstreammediacensorship/home .

[36]. “Mainstream media lying”: https://sites.google.com/site/mainstreammedialying/ .

[37]. Joris Toonders, “Data is the new oil of the digital economy”, Wired, 2014: https://www.wired.com/insights/2014/07/data-new-oil-digital-economy/ .

 

[38]. Rima Najjar, “Hillel and Facebook censorship: conflating Zionism with Judaism”, Countercurrents, 26 February 2018: https://countercurrents.org/2018/02/26/hillel-facebook-censorship-conflating-zionism-judaism/ .

 

[39]. “Gideon Polya”: https://sites.google.com/site/drgideonpolya/home .

 

Dr Gideon Polya taught science students at a major Australian university for 4 decades. He published some 130 works in a 5 decade scientific career, most recently a huge pharmacological reference text “Biochemical Targets of Plant Bioactive Compounds” (CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, New York & London , 2003). He has published “Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950” (G.M. Polya, Melbourne, 2007: http://globalbodycount.blogspot.com/ ); see also his contributions “Australian complicity in Iraq mass mortality” in “Lies, Deep Fries & Statistics” (edited by Robyn Williams, ABC Books, Sydney, 2007: http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/ockhamsrazor/australian-complicity-in-iraq-mass-mortality/3369002#transcript

) and “Ongoing Palestinian Genocide” in “The Plight of the Palestinians (edited by William Cook, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2010: http://mwcnews.net/focus/analysis/4047-the-plight-of-the-palestinians.html ). He has published a revised and updated 2008 version of his 1998 book “Jane Austen and the Black Hole of British History” (see: http://janeaustenand.blogspot.com/  ) as biofuel-, globalization- and climate-driven global food price increases threaten a greater famine catastrophe than the man-made famine in British-ruled India that killed 6-7 million Indians in the “forgotten” World War 2 Bengal Famine (see recent BBC broadcast involving Dr Polya, Economics Nobel Laureate Professor Amartya Sen and others: http://www.open.edu/openlearn/history-the-arts/history/social-economic-history/listen-the-bengal-famine  ;  Gideon Polya: https://sites.google.com/site/drgideonpolya/home  ; Gideon Polya Writing: https://sites.google.com/site/gideonpolyawriting/ ; Gideon Polya, Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gideon_Polya ) . When words fail one can say it in pictures – for images of Gideon Polya’s huge paintings for the Planet, Peace, Mother and Child see: http://sites.google.com/site/artforpeaceplanetmotherchild/ and http://www.flickr.com/photos/gideonpolya/  .

Support Countercurrents

Countercurrents is answerable only to our readers. Support honest journalism because we have no PLANET B.
Become a Patron at Patreon

Join Our Newsletter

GET COUNTERCURRENTS DAILY NEWSLETTER STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX

Join our WhatsApp and Telegram Channels

Get CounterCurrents updates on our WhatsApp and Telegram Channels

Related Posts

Join Our Newsletter


Annual Subscription

Join Countercurrents Annual Fund Raising Campaign and help us

Latest News