When I first came to Russia I was thrilled by any artifact of the Soviet Union, by every Red Star I saw atop a building, by every hammer and sickle bas relief.  The statues of Marx across from the Bolshoi, of Engles standing tall in the small park across from Kropotkinskaya Metro sent shivers up my spine.  But I will tell you that today, on May 1, 2018, they are but hardly noticed remembrances of things past.  May Day is no longer celebrated as a day to honor the workers of the world.  It is a nameless day off.  There is a march going on as I write, but the Communists red flags, like the Communists who carry them, are few.  Instead, the red, white and blue of modern Russian is dominant.  (See picture).


I seek succor from my solitary disappointment in the pages of Countercurrents.  But I cannot find any real comfort in FarooqueChowdhury’s article on May Day nor a glimmer of inspiration in the overfamiliar image of the raised fist.  I read Fred Magdoff’s elucidation of the evils of Capitalism, and find nothing new there.  I remember….everything is remembrance of things past at this point….when I was a young woman inspired by the work of Fred’s father,  Harry Magdoff, and his colleague Paul Sweezy.  The very saying of their names connected me to them, somehow defined me.  But it is all so overfamiliar now; all a remembrance of things and times past.

Neitherdo John Bellamy Foster’ words nor Yate’s prophesizing bring me comfort.   The sorrow I feel at the passing of the Soviet Union and the failure of the workers of the world to rebel against the hellish conditions of their existence, weighs heavily on me this spring morning in Moscow.

I want, want desperately to believe once again what Fred Magdoff says “When people are pushed and pushed down again and as their lives deteriorate, they eventually will fight back.” I remember reading and being moved emotionally and intellectually by Harry Braverman’sLabor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century,  published in 1974 by Monthly Review Press. But if Braverman thought labor was degraded then, he should only see its current level of dehumanization to fully understand exactly how bad things have become.  .  The condition of the working class differs from the condition of the working class in the mines and factories in the early 20th century, only in so far as the environments they work in are cleaner and safer, and this not because capitalism has become more enlightened, but because these most exploited members of the working class now work in fast food establishments.  No less then their historical antecedents they work long hours for wages so low that they need government support to buy food.  They have few if any days off, no paid vacations, and no benefits and no unions.  Moreover, should they even think about rising up to protest the conditions of their existence, they would find themselves confronted by the well armedbuillies of total survelliance states, just as the 19th century workers before them faced the brutal spies of the Pinkerton Guards.

Many seek to escape the desperation and degradation as workers in service industries, by becoming “illegal” small time capitalists themselves and dealing drugs.  Unwilling to work at McDonalds, these small time “illegal” capitalists are put in “McPrisons”, private penal institutions that profit off their incarcerations.  There they work for less, brutalized more, but at least housed and fed.

Remember too, that when Braverman wrote, America was not yet a drugged nation.  What are the statistics?   How many Americans are now addicted to narcotics, legally and illegally?  What percentage of the population is drugged at any given moment of any given day: drugged to stabilize their moods, drugged to mute their anger, drugged to numb them \ from the sadness of their existence, self drugged to escape from the realities of their degraded and dehumanized lives?

I never blame the working class for their condition.  That is not what I am saying; rather, what I am saying is that they are too busy trying to survive, too in need of escape, too intimidated by the state bullying, to make any sort of revolution.  They are too weak to overthrow Capitalism because Capitalism weakens them.

If there is to be a revolution, and there must be, then it cannot come from the degraded and dehumanized working class, but only from the elite members of that working class:  those whose labor has not been completely degraded, those who work with their minds and are difficult to replace, those who bring into being and employ modern day technology.  It is the vanguard of the working class, this finely educated and highly skilled segment, that will make revolution of any revolution is to be made.  They are themselves filled with contradictions.  On the one hand, they are rebellious and defiant,…..that is my opinion and not a fact.  On the other, they see that they can very easily become very rich capitalists themselves: capitalists like Bill Gates and PavelDurov, and  many others who became insanely wealthy by inventing new technologies.  In this sense, they are no different than so many other inventor Capitalist entrepreneurs: think Henry Ford, think Thomas Edison, etc.

Yet for the vast majority, those who will not invent some new app or device, should they ever become organized or develop a class consciousness or moral values which lead them to understand there is something wrong with the fact that so few are so very wealthy while so many go hungry, or that the planet and its inhabitants are being destroyed by the drive for profits, or that the permanent war economy is of no benefit to the masses of humanity, well then, they will rise up, cast their lot with the downtrodden and oppressed, and change the world.  Think Edward Snowdon here.

Yet on this May Day, despite my sadness, I remain a Marxist.

Mary Metzger is a 72 year old retired teacher who has lived in Moscow for the past ten years. She studied Women’s Studies under Barbara Eherenreich and Deidre English at S.U.N.Y. Old Westerbury. She did her graduate work at New York University under Bertell Ollman where she studied Marx, Hegel and the Dialectic. She went on to teach at Kean University, Rutgers University, N.Y.U., and most recenly, at The Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology where she taught the Philosophy of Science. Her particular area of interest is the dialectic of nature, and she is currently working on a history of the dialectic. She is the mother of three, the gradmother of five, and the great grandmother of 2.




Countercurrents is answerable only to our readers. Support honest journalism because we have no PLANET B. Become a Patron at Patreon Subscribe to our Telegram channel



  1. Thomas Riggins says:

    It’s not the “elite” workers vs non “elite” that will make the Revolution. Unless the inner contradictions of the capitalist system finally make it crash and stay crashed there will be no Revolution and if that part of the working class responsible for the creation of surplus value isn’t ready to step in and take control of the state and the economy (if there is no vanguard Marxist-Lenin party leading it) there will be no socialist Revolution.

  2. You may be right……But here is my Marxist Logic: The mode of production has four parts: Nature, Man, Classes, forces of production. We could say three: Man’s relationship to nature, man’s relationship to man in class societies, Man’s relationship to the forces and means of production. In any case, it is the development of the forces and means of production which are truly revolutionary. In modern society these forces of production are no longer machines which produce commodities, but machines which control all of society…these are employed by the capitalist state in a multitude of ways, the primary of which is the suppression of rebellion and revolution. Think the surveillance state. Those who know how to control and/or operate these machines are the ones that can bring about the downfall of the capitalist state..

    This revolutionary segment of the working class, has already begun its process of confrontation with the capitalist state and it institutions: think block chain technology which potentially possesses the possibility of eliminating the capitalist state and its financial institutions. This is happening now.

    Anyway….we shall see won’t we.

    Thanks for reading my article.