It’s true, with Western propagandistic headlines like this, who needs NATO, who really needs them as even friends. Perhaps the barrage of such vitriol has caused two vital allies of Washington, Ankara and Islamabad, to be fare more cautious from here on out.

It was bad before in previous decades, but headlines like this – NOT in right wing cheerleaders of empire like Fox News – but in virtually all of the LIBERAL media  (who consider themselves more sophisticated and nuanced), we see one ridiculous (and dangerous) headline after the next.

It’s not Erdogan or Imran Khan per se who bother Western elites.

It is what they represent: the de-centering of the West, the re-orienting of the world order, and the profound crisis and rapidly collapsing  world system of the 500 year project of coloniality. The Erdogans, Khans, etc., In a nutshell, represent the irresolvable crises of ‘whiteness’ (in a world that is finally beginning to mentally decolonize from prostrating before the the White Man – used here as a political category rather than merely a racial one ). It is a crisis of that white supremacist world order, and a crisis of the post-WWII liberal international order that Western hegemony thought it could dominate endlessly – all culminating now in the relative structural decline of the Western plutocracies

Of course, the leading American politicos and financiers fully grasp this situation but keep getting convinced by the warmongering neocons and Zionists in DC that the Empire can reverse its decline by reckless threats and flexing its military muscle. Or, if that doesn’t work, learn from the German and Italian leaders of the 1930s about how to deal with the ‘Muslim Question’.

Indeed, headlines like this infantile one reflect that. They have become indistinguishable from any utter nonsense one may expect from many one-man, one-party, and one-media kind of states (many of which are close allies of Washington), something to be reflexively dismissed because everyone knows it’s pure state propaganda.

And in the headline referred to here, the mythology we are expected to swallow is just too insulting to our intelligence. Erdogan and the AKP were the first forces ever to make overtures to the Kurds, to both integrate them and grant them autonomy. In fact, Turkey’’s worst crimes against the Kurds peaked in the 1990a with complete military and political support from Washington. A decade ago, Erdogan and the AKP were ‘NATO’s Islamists’ and promoted as a model for the Muslim world, repeated ad adnauseum by every Western think tank.

So yes, the Kurds have been treated horribly by the state of Turkey, but that is a long history of secular military repression long preceding Erdogan and the AKP party that initially tried to ameliorate the conflict.

The fact of the matter is that the Gulf petro autocrats, their best friend the Zionist regime, and Washington never can tolerate any leader – from the global South and especially if s/he happens to be Muslim – getting too big for their boots…

The Saudis in particular are aching to punish Erdogan since he made sure that the Saudis would not just run roughshod and take over Qatar, since Turkey sent its troops immediately to defend Qatar from the Saudi invasion. .

After all, the House of Saud believes that the GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) and indeed all Muslim nations exist to serve them and their interests alone. They are – or at least claim to be –  the custodians of the two holy mosques and Islam more generally, so the House of Saud expects a default genuflection to its tyranny by all Muslims of the world.

Fortunately, that is the fictitious  fantasy land of the ‘reformer’ Crown Prince Mohammad Bin Salman (MBS), whose wet dreams undoubtedly are instigated by the smile on his face knowing Yemenis, Gazans, etc. are being butchered.

MBS should know not let his feelings get hurt by the fact that overwhelming majority of the Muslims throughout the world only care to visit or even think of Saudi Arabia when it comes to performing their mandatory religious ritual of Hajj (pilgrimmage). Other than that, they see the House of Saud as the curse upon the Muslim world that it is, always on the side of oppression and subjugation, and ingratiating itself with its protectors in Washington at whatever price demanded. The Emiratis play the exact same game.

It is incredulous that n light of the criminal wars  and humanitarian catastrophes in Yemen, Gaza, and at the US-Mexico border where entire familis are being ripped apart, the Western plutocracies and their lapdog media organs are vomiting the most vulgar hypocrisy imaginable – when it comes the ‘non-West,’ the ‘non-White,’ and especially, the Muslim.

Nevertheless, we must never forget the courage of the many in the West resisting the creeping fascism that their elites are trying to impose on them and the world.

Junaid S. Ahmad is a PhD Candidate in Decolonial Thought, School of Sociology, University of Leeds, a Research Fellow, Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA), Istanbul, and Director of the Center for Global Studies, School of Advanced Studies, UMT, Lahore, Pakistan

Countercurrents is answerable only to our readers. Support honest journalism because we have no PLANET B. Become a Patron at Patreon Subscribe to our Telegram channel



  1. Farooque Chowdhury says:

    The article says: “So yes, the Kurds have been treated horribly by the state of Turkey, but that is a long history of secular military repression long preceding Erdogan and the AKP party that initially tried to ameliorate the conflict.”

    What about now? What happened a few months ago? It’ll be nice if another article is produced on the condition of the Kurds under Erdogan, if even Kurds’ version is not heard. That will be a factual presentation. That will be credible. It’ll be much more credible if the Kurds’ version is also presented while making claims on Erdogan.

    According to the article, if not misunderstood, Erdogan or Imran Khan “represent: the de-centering of the West, the re-orienting of the world order.”

    Is it? What do facts tell? What’s meant by “the West”? Is it imperialism? Is it imperialism in the western part from Turkey? What do their moves tell?

    What’s meant by “crises of ‘whiteness’”? What’s meant by “whiteness”? What about the black plunderer sahibs in Nigeria and semi-white plunderer sahibs in-between the Asia and the Europe? Is there any crisis of sultans with some other color? Can the crisis be explained on the basis of color?

    Are these Erdogan and Imran Khan in conflict with Kemal Ataturk? No answer on Ataturk?

    It will be nice if an article comes up with answers to these questions.

    Basic questions will create more difficulty to substantiate these claims of “de-centering” and “re-orienting” by Mr. Brave and Mr. Courageous.

    Science has explained these questions long ago. Using words by borrowing from science and ignoring science make nothing but deceive oneself. The claims sound nice, can impress the ignorants, but a simple dissection will turn these meaningless. Even, dissection is not needed. A few questions will make the claims meaningless. No world order can be re- or de- ed with backward, secterian, chauvinistic ideas, and with ideas living in the middle age. Capitalism is going through crisis, but it can neither be be questioned nor be explained with backward ideas. A lump of mud has never made a Napoleon or his nephew, not even an Ottoman Sultan or an imagined Nabob of Dera Ismail Khan.