Convicted lynchers can get bail, why not under trials ?

One of the famous political philosophers, Montesquieu, in his 18th century book “The Spirit of the Laws” wrote  that “There is no greater tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of the law and in the name of justice.” The quote holds true especially in the context of 21st century India. Recently, Jharkhand was in news for all the wrong reasons when a serving union minister of BJP, who also happens to be a Harvard graduate, felicitated and garlanded eight convicted murderers in a public ceremony. One can only wonder that if eight “convicted” murderers can get bail, what about the majority of Dalit and Adivasi undertrials who have been languishing for years in the prisons of Jharkhand ?

The government’s penchant for arrest and bail is peculiar. It has been a month since the brutal attack on noted social activist Swami Agnivesh in Jharkhand, yet no arrests have been made so far. while anyone who so much as whispers that ‘the emperor wear no clothes’ is slapped with sedition. This includes a list of 20 activists who have been   the Jharkhand  government on its various excesses, labour organisations protesting against land laws amendments and the huge number of adivasis, dalits and other backward classes who  have been trapped in false cases whenever they have dared to assert their constitutional rights. It is an opportune time to throw light on the condition of undertrials in Jharkhand, away from the light and glare of national media and civil rights organizations.

One of the major findings of a study of undertrials in Jharkhand titled “Deprived of rights over natural resources, impoverished Adivasis get prison” highlights that tribals and dalits branded as Naxals, have been booked under the draconian UAPA act and the major anti-state sections of the IPC. The study conducted by Bagaicha, a social action centre,  examined 102 case studies of people put behind bars for their alleged Maoist links. The report found that 98% of those arrested as Naxalites had no involvement whatsoever with the movement. Only two of them accepted (to the interviewing research team) they had any relation with any of the Left-wing extremist groups. The rest  arrested asserted that they had been wrongly framed and arrested. Another study by B.I.R.S.A on extremist activities in Jharkhand and their impact on civil society concluded that, the number of undertrials in Jharkhand prison are on a steady increase. In most  cases, the police has been unable to complete framing of charge against them.

The problem of undertrials in not of Jharkhand alone. 67% of people in Indian jails are undertrials — people not convicted of any crime and currently on trial in a court of law. However, according to the latest NCRB Prison Statistics 2015, Jharkhand has the fourth highest number of undertrials staying in one of the worst conditions. An alarming 77.1 % of Jharkhand prison population consists of undertrials, most of which are dalits, tribals and minorities. For every 4 inmates, 3 of them are undertrials in Jharkhand.

Data That Speaks For Itself

The percentage of under-trial prisoners stands as 29% Scheduled Tribes (STs), 32% Other Backward Castes (OBCs), 22% general and 17% Scheduled Castes (SCs). The proportion of ST and SC undertrials are disproportionately higher while considering their respective share in the total population of the state. ST’s constitute the highest number of prisoners (undertrials plus convicts) incarcerated in various jails of Jharkhand. The total number of SC and ST behind bars (46%) is more than their total percentage population (38%) in Jharkhand.


Figure 1 : Under-trial Prisoners in Jharkhand (social-group wise)

Demonstrated by both data and real situation in prisons, it is evident that the poor, disadvantaged and the neglected segments of the society who are unable to either secure the bail amount for release or are not aware of the legal provisions to avail the judicial remedy of seeking a bail. What they lack is political and social capital. Such long detention not only violates their right to liberty constitutionally guaranteed to every citizen, but also amounts to outright denial of human right of freedom of movement to the marginalised sections of the society. In West Singhbhum’s Chaibasa jail, 72  prisoners who faced a total of 108 cases  were  identified. The  disposal  of  as  many  as  101  of  the  108  cases  were  found  held  up  due  to  some  inordinate delay. One can notice a double whammy of marginalisation and discrimination existing within the criminal justice system.


Figure 2: Percentage of SC, ST undertrials vs Census 2011

About 49% of undertrial prisoners, according to the latest available Prison Statistics, belong to the age-group of 18-30 years, the most productive years of one’s life. About 41% of them belong to 30-50 years, the most creative years of one’s life. By denying young offenders bail,  the state is further victimising them as the best of their years are wasted, instead of being deployed in learning a skill which would help them survive  the real world.


  Figure 3 : Percentage of Undertrials under specific age groups.

However, it’s not only Adivasis and Dalits, Muslims and Christians undertrials are also overrepresented in prisons across Jharkhand, when data from NCRB prison statistics is compared against their population in Jharkhand. Collectively, these two groups form a population of  19% with a share of 14.53% and 4.30% respectively according to 2011 census, but their share in prisoners, both convicted and undertrials is larger than their share in country’s population.


            Figure 4: Percentage of Undertrials vs their population

Moreover, what makes the entire situation worse is deplorable conditions of these prisons. Jharkhand has 29 jails across 24 districts. The number of inmates accommodated in jail against the authorized capacity of 100 inmates is 114. This means that  jails are overcrowded and already meagre resources are shared amongst greater number of people. One of the primary reasons for overcrowding of prisons is the pendency of court cases.  Additionally, Jharkhand has the least number of prison staff. According to Prison Statistics 2015, the highest number of inmates per prison staff was reported from Jharkhand. Understaffing and overcrowding goes hand in hand in Jharkhand prisons.

Tota Prison Capacity 15408
Total Occupancy 17613
Occupancy rate 114%

Table 1 : Occupancy rate in Jharkhand Prisons

In a related development, a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the Persecuted Prisoners Solidarity Committee [PPSC] on under-trial prisoners in the jails of Jharkhand brought a ray of  hope to an otherwise grim situation. The petition has alleged that Adivasis, Muslims, Christians and Dalits, thousands in number have been languishing in prison because their trials have been deliberately prolonged and seeks to expedite criminal proceedings long pending before criminal courts in Jharkhand. The court had asked the prisons to place before the court the details of all under-trial prisoners in all the jails of the state. The latest hearing was on 8th August, 2018 in which

Despite Supreme Court’s order on conducting speedy trials , Jharkhand seems to be in no hurry to act. States have the primary role, responsibility and authority to change current prison laws, rules and regulations. The state must bring back its focus on the cardinal principle of criminal law in India where bail is the rule and jail the exception !

Sania Mariam is an associate consultant with the Policy & Development Advisory Group, a policy firm based in Ranchi and New Delhi.

This article was first published by


Support Countercurrents

Countercurrents is answerable only to our readers. Support honest journalism because we have no PLANET B.
Become a Patron at Patreon

Join Our Newsletter


Join our WhatsApp and Telegram Channels

Get CounterCurrents updates on our WhatsApp and Telegram Channels

Related Posts

Join Our Newsletter

Annual Subscription

Join Countercurrents Annual Fund Raising Campaign and help us

Latest News