3 engineering experts from the University of Alaska Fairbanks have produced a detailed report entitled “A structural reevaluation of the collapse of World Trade Center 7” that concludes that “the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building” i.e. by explosive demolition and not by fire as asserted by the lying US Government. However, lying  Mainstream Media near-totally ignore this expert new 9/11 WTC7 demolition Report.

As Democratic  Presidential candidate Joe Biden  stated in his powerful and inspiring Nomination Acceptance Speech in referring to rotten Trump behaviour in relation to racists: “Silence is complicity” [1]. Indeed Joe Biden has repeated the “Silence is complicity”  aphorism on many other occasions (e.g. see [2-4)]. The 9/11 WTC7 Demolition report was available in a preliminary form on 3 September 2019 [5-7] and in a final form from March 2020 [8, 9]. Indeed there has been considerable coverage of this expert and explosive (pun intended) Report in progressive Alternative Media (e.g. [5-7]) but near-total ignoring of this expert Report by Mainstream journalist, editor, politician , academic and commentariat presstitutes who have thus become complicit  after the event in the 9/11 atrocity that killed 3,000 people, mostly Americans [10]. However through their silence these Mainstream presstitutes have also become deeply complicit in the US-imposed post-9/11 Muslim Holocaust and Muslim Genocide (aka the US War on Terror or the US War on Muslims) in which 32 million Muslims have died from violence, 5 million, or from deprivation, 27 million,  in 20 countries invaded by the US Alliance since the US Government’s 9/11 false flag atrocity (2015 estimate; [11-14]).

(1). The lying Bush Administration “official version of 9/11”.

The following  bare-bones “official version of 9/11 is based on pertinent extracts  from the Wikipedia account [10]: “At 8:46 a.m., five hijackers crashed American Airlines Flight 11 into the northern facade of the World Trade Center’s North Tower (1 WTC). At 9:03 a.m., another five hijackers crashed United Airlines Flight 175 into the southern facade of the South Tower (2 WTC).  Five hijackers flew American Airlines Flight 77 into the Pentagon at 9:37 a.m. A fourth flight, United Airlines Flight 93, crashed near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, southeast of Pittsburgh, at 10:03 a.m…

Three buildings in the World Trade Center collapsed due to fire-induced structural failure. The South Tower collapsed at 9:59 a.m. after burning for 56 minutes in a fire caused by the impact of United Airlines Flight 175 and the explosion of its fuel. The North Tower collapsed at 10:28 a.m. after burning for 102 minutes. When the North Tower collapsed, debris fell on the nearby 7 World Trade Center building (7 WTC), damaging it and starting fires. These fires burned for hours, compromising the building’s structural integrity, and 7 WTC collapsed at 5:21 p.m. The west side of the Pentagon sustained significant damage…

The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) investigated the collapses of the Twin Towers and 7 WTC… The investigation into the collapse of 1 WTC and 2 WTC was concluded in October 2005 and that of 7 WTC was completed in August 2008. NIST found that the fireproofing on the Twin Towers’ steel infrastructures was blown off by the initial impact of the planes and that, had this not occurred, the towers likely would have remained standing…  heat from a typical office fire would have softened and weakened the exposed girders and columns enough to initiate the collapse regardless of the number of columns cut or damaged by the impact… NIST concluded that uncontrolled fires in 7 WTC caused floor beams and girders to heat and subsequently “caused a critical support column to fail, initiating a fire-induced progressive collapse that brought the building down” [10].

(2). Numerous science, engineering, architecture, aviation, military and intelligence experts reject the lying Bush “official version of 9/11”.

Science involves the critical testing of potentially falsifiable hypotheses to obtain successively better models of reality, and  scientists have zero tolerance for lying because it sabotages this fundamental process.  The US Center for Public Integrity determined that the Bush Administration told 935 lies about Iraq alone between 9/11 and the illegal and war criminal invasion of Iraq [15, 16] . Eminent anti-racist Jewish American journalist I.F Stone (author of “The Hidden History of the Korean War, 1950-1951”) bluntly advised journalism students: “Among all the things I’m going to tell you today about being a journalist, all you have to remember is two words: governments lie” [17], and eminent US writer and historian Gore Vidal has declared: “Unlike most Americans who lie all the time, I hate lying. And here I am surrounded with these hills [in Hollywood] full of liars — some very talented… Americans are not interested in the truth about anything. They assume everybody is lying because they go out and lie everyday about the automobile they are trying to sell you… This is a country of hoax. P.T. Barnum is the god of this republic, which is no longer a republic alas. It is an oligarchy and a rather vicious one” [18].

In addition to sane rejection of bizarre, Hollywood movie-style assertions from successive, utterly mendacious US Administrations, as a half century career scientist I have continuing fundamental problems with the lying Bush “official version of 9/11”. From basic  chemistry and physics I know  that (a) the black smoke and orange flame from WTC1 and WTC2 now observed repeatedly by billions meant a low temperature fire rather than the metal-softening high temperatures critically claimed by NIST;  (b) that  near-free fall  collapse of  the 47 storey WTC7 in the first 2.5 seconds of its 7 second collapse implies massive removal of resistance by explosive demolition [19]; (c) that at a big passenger jet’s  landing speed of about 60 metres per second gives a landing spot deviation of about 60 metres per second of pilot deviation, and  a cruising speed of 270 metres per second gives a target spot deviation of 270 metres per second of pilot indecision – yet it is asserted by lying Bush that hijackers with limited flying experience on single-engine light aircraft could land  huge  passenger jets precisely “on a dime” Hollywood-style into the WTC Twin Towers or an outer  door of the Pentagon (there is a popular spot next to Melbourne Airport where you can stand a few hundred feet below the flight path of incoming landing passenger jets and really appreciate what a 1 second deviation could mean when jets are landing just a few seconds later); and (d) that the pulverising of 3 circa 50-100 story skyscrapers  in about 10 seconds  into a pile of sheared steel, molten metal, concrete rubble and vast amounts of fine dust with relatively negligible energy input utterly defies thermodynamics – if as asserted by lying Bush and slavishly echoed by Western journalist, editor, politician, academic and commentariat  presstitutes, then  the hijackers (none from Iraq or Afghanistan despite  subsequent 9/11-based US  invasion of these countries) had discovered an astonishing new form of energy.

For a large number of reasons numerous science, engineering, architecture, aviation, military and intelligence experts reject the lying Bush “official version of 9/11” as variously inconsistent with chemistry and physics and with a wealth of other evidence (for details see [14, 19-26]). The discovery by Professor Niels Harrit and colleagues of active thermitic explosive material in dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center catastrophe provided chemical physics-based evidence for the destruction of  the Twin Tower buildings by nanoparticle  thermite-based explosive demolition [26]. Now 3 engineering experts  from the Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks have produced a detailed Report on the collapse of World Trade Center Building  7 that concludes that “the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building” i.e. by explosive demolition and not by fire as asserted by the lying US Government [8, 9].

(3). Professor  Leroy Hulsey, Dr. Zhili Quan, and Professor  Feng Xiao (Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks),  “A structural reevaluation of the collapse of World Trade Center 7”.

Professor  Leroy Hulsey, Dr. Zhili Quan, and Professor  Feng Xiao (Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks) in their  detailed Final Report  into “A structural reevaluation of the collapse of World Trade Center 7” stated in the Executive Summary (2020): “This report presents the findings and conclusions of a four-year study of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7)—a 47-story building that suffered a total collapse at 5:20 PM on September 11, 2001, following the horrible events of that morning. Figure E.1 shows the layout of WTC7 in relation to the World Trade Center complex prior to September 11, 2001.Figure E.2 shows the structural layout of Floor 13.Figure E.3 shows the finite element model of WTC 7. This study was conducted by a three-person team of researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering with funding provided by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Inc., a 501(c)(3) non profit organization whose purpose is to conduct research and educate the public about the World Trade Center building collapses on 9/11. According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology(NIST)—an agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce that investigated the three building failures on 9/11—the collapse of WTC 7 was the first known instance of the total collapse of a tall building primarily due to fires. However, many independent researchers have studied the collapse of WTC 7and assembled a body of evidence that raises questions about the validity of NIST’s conclusions. The objective of this study, therefore, was threefold: (1) Examine the structural response of WTC 7 to fire loads that may have occurred on September 11,2001; (2)Rule out scenarios that could not have caused the observed collapse; and (3)Identify types of failures and their locations that may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed… It is our conclusion based upon these findings that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building” [8].

Feng Xiao (Associate Professor, Nanjing University of Science and Technology) and Zhili Quan (Bridge Engineer, South Carolina Department of Transportation) summarizing “in plain English” the expert report on the WTC Building 7 collapse (2020): “This is a study of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) — a 47-story building that suffered a total collapse at 5:20 PM on September 11, 2001, following the horrible events of that morning. The objective of the study was threefold: (1) Examine the structural response of WTC 7 to fire loads that may have occurred on September 11, 2001; (2) Rule out scenarios that could not have caused the observed collapse; and (3) Identify types of failures and their locations that may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed. The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001. First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred. Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Third, we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed. The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building” [9].

Professor  Feng Xiao and Dr Zhili  also provided a video showing the perfectly symmetrical (i.e. “perfect” demolition) of WTC7: http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7  [9] – it is the most “perfect” demolition of a large structure that I have ever seen by video, but you play it and you be the judge.

(4). Lying, US-beholden Western Mainstream media almost totally ignore  this explosive new WTC7 demolition report but lavishly denigrate critics of the lying Bush “official version of 9/11” as “conspiracy theorists”  and “9/11 truthers”.

US-beholden Western  Mainstream media have an appalling record of lying that occurs in 2 forms, lying by commission (notably by the Yellow Tabloid Press and the right-wing Murdoch Media Empire) and lying by omission (the cowardly stratagem of the so-called and self-assertedly “quality” Mainstream media like the New York Times and the Washington Post).  Outstanding American humanitarian writer Barbara Kingsolver has described this perversion in her brilliant novel “The Lacuna” (lacuna meaning hiatus, blank, missing part, gap, cavity, or empty space) has  Russian Communist revolutionary and theorist Leon Trotsky (Lev) and his assistant Van having the following discussion about media (2009): “”But newspapers have a duty to truth”, Van said. Lev [Trotsky] clicked his tongue. “They tell the truth only as the exception. Zola [French novelist of “J’accuse” fame] wrote that the mendacity of the press could be could be divided into two groups: the yellow press lies every day without hesitating. But others, like the Times, speak the truth on all inconsequential occasions, so they can deceive the public with the requisite authority when it becomes necessary.” Van got up from his chair to gather the cast-off newspapers. Lev took off his glasses and rubbed his eyes. “I don’t mean to offend the journalists; they aren’t any different from other people. They’re merely the megaphones of other people” … [Trotsky observes to his assistant Shepherd] “Soli, let me tell you. The most important thing about a person is always the thing you don’t know”” [27].

Of course lying by omission is far, far worse than lying by commission because the latter at least permits public refutation and public debate [28-31].

I have done Google Searches to determine the extent of Mainstream media ignoring  (censorship,  fake news through lying by omission) of the explosive WTC7 Report by Leroy Hulsey and colleagues entitled “A structural reevaluation of the collapse of World Trade Center 7”.

A Google Search for “A structural reevaluation of the collapse of World Trade Center 7” (21 August 2020) yielded 318 results but of these only 2 were from Mainstream media, namely Yahoo and Sputnik (Russia).

A Google Search for the lead author “Leroy Hulsey” (21 August 2020) yielded 328 results but of these only 2 were from Mainstream media, namely Yahoo and the UK Express.

In a remarkable and obscene converse,  Mainstream media lavishly and offensively denigrate any critic of the lying Bush “official version of 9/11” as “conspiracy theorist” or “9/11 truther”.

Thus a Google Search for “conspiracy theorist” yields 3,910,000 results (22 August 2020) – inspection of the first 100 results reveal that they are overwhelmingly  from Mainstream or right-wing media.

A Google Search for “9/11 truther” yields 140,000 results (22 August 2020) – inspection of the first 100 results reveal that they are overwhelmingly  from Mainstream or right-wing media.

(5). Some thoughtful comments on the explosive new WTC7 demolition report.

Dr Paul Craig Roberts (eminent US economist, author and commentator) (2019): “A research team at the University of Alaska’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, led by Dr. Leroy Hulsey, Dr. Zhili Quan, and Professor Feng Xiao, Department of Civil Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, released on September 3, 2019, for public comment their findings from a four-year study of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 on September 11, 2001. This is the first scientific investigation of the collapse of the building. Here is the conclusion: “The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.” Notice three things: (1) it has taken 18 years to get a real investigation of the destruction of a building blamed on Muslim terrorists, (2) the only way “near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building” can occur is through controlled demolition, and (3) this remarkable finding is not reported in the presstitute media. In other words, the study is assigned to the Memory Hole. This is the way The Matrix operates. This is why you need this website. The only purpose of print and TV news is to program you so that you insouciantly go along with the agendas of those who rule you. Those who sit in front of TV news, listen to NPR, or read newspapers are programmed to be mindless automatons” [5].

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (2019): “University study finds fire did not bring down World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11. On September 11, 2001, at 5:20 PM, the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 collapsed into its footprint, falling more than 100 feet at the rate of gravity for 2.5 seconds of its seven-second destruction. Today, we at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth are pleased to partner with the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) in releasing the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of WTC 7’s collapse conducted by researchers in the university’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. The release of the draft report begins a two-month period during which the public is invited to submit comments. The final report will be published later this year. We invite you to read the report and to watch Dr. Leroy Hulsey’s September 3rd presentation at the UAF campus, where he first announced his team’s findings” [6].

Australian Citizens Party (2019): “A research team at the University of Alaska Fairbanks engineering department has concluded that fire did not cause the collapse of World Trade Centre Building 7 (WTC 7) on 11 September 2001. Professor of Civil Engineering Dr J. Leroy Hulsey, who led the research team, has demonstrated that the official US government version of the WTC 7 collapse is a scientific fraud, which leaves us with some very troubling questions about the entire 9/11 attacks… The official US government analysis of WTC 7 from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) was released in August 2008. At a news conference, NIST lead investigator Shyam Sunder concluded: “WTC 7 collapsed because of fires fuelled by office furnishings. It did not collapse from explosives or from fuel oil fires.” This statement infuriated many engineers and architects. No skyscraper in the world had ever collapsed at freefall speed as a result of office fires. This only occurs in a controlled demolition. The official explanation defies the laws of physics! Dr Hulsey concluded: “We simulated every plausible scenario, and we found that the series of failures that NIST claimed triggered a progressive collapse of the entire structure could not have occurred. The only thing that could have brought this structure down in the manner observed on 9/11 is the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building… With few exceptions, the mainstream media ignored what should have been major news” [7].

Final comments.

Dr Paul Craig Roberts has commented on a forthcoming Federal grand jury investigation of 9/11 (2019): “Although the United States is allegedly a democracy with a rule of law, it has taken 17 years for public pressure to bring about the first grand jury investigation of 9/11. Based on the work of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth led by Richard Gage, first responder and pilots organizations, books by David Ray Griffin and others, and eyewitness testimony, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry has presented enough hard facts to the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York to force his compliance with the provisions of federal law that require the convening of a federal grand jury to investigate for the first time the attacks of September 11, 2001. This puts the US Justice (sic) Department in an extraordinary position. Every informed person is aware that elements of the US government were involved either in the perpetration of the 9/11 attacks or in a coverup of the attacks” [32]. Decent people can only hope that Dr Roberts is correct in his estimation, and that the truth can prevail over 2 decades of Mainstream media-complicit US Government lying over 9-11 – the social, political and global implications are immense.

References.

[1]. Daniel Marans and Tara Golshan, “Joe Biden’s most unifying message: human decency””, Huffington Post, 21 August 2020: https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/joe-biden-character-democratic-national-convention-2020_n_5f3f4d26c5b6305f3255b960?ri18n=true .

[2]. “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris speech transcript August 12: first campaign event as running mates”, Rev, 12 August 2020: https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/joe-biden-and-kamala-harris-speech-transcript-august-12-first-campaign-event-as-running-mates .

[3]. “Joe Biden quotes”, Goodreads: https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/614246.Joe_Biden?page=2 .

[4]. Shane Croucher, “Joe Biden on America under Trump: “Silence is complicity – our children are listening””, Newsweek, 13 July 2018: https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-america-under-trump-silence-complicity-our-children-are-listening-1022171 .

[5]. Paul Craig Roberts, “The official story of the collapse of WTC Building 7 lies in ruins”, Foreign Policy Journal, 6 September  2019: https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2019/09/06/the-official-story-of-the-collapse-of-wtc-building-7-lies-in-ruins/ .

[6]. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, “University study finds fire did not bring down World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11”, 3 September 2019: https://www.ae911truth.org/news/561-university-study-finds-fire-did-not-bring-down-world-trade-center-building-7-on-9-11 .

[7]. Australian Citizens Party, “Engineering experts expose 9/11 lies”,  Australian Alert Service 18 September 2019: https://citizensparty.org.au/engineering-experts-expose-911-lies .

[8]. Dr. J. Leroy Hulsey, Dr. Zhili Quan, and Professor Feng Xiao (Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks) , Final Report. “A structural reevaluation of the collapse of World Trade Center 7”, March 2020: https://files.wtc7report.org/file/public-download/A-Structural-Reevaluation-of-the-Collapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf .

[9]. Feng Xiao and Zhili Quan, “A structural reevaluation of the collapse of World Trade Center 7”, Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks, March 2020: http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7 .

[10]. “September 11 attacks”, Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks .

[11]. Gideon Polya, “US-Imposed Post-9/11 Muslim Holocaust & Muslim Genocide” , Korsgaard Publishing, Germany, 4 June 2020: https://www.amazon.com/US-Imposed-Post-9-Muslim-Holocaust-Genocide/dp/8793987056  .

[12]. Gideon Polya, “Racist Mainstream ignores “US-Imposed Post-9/11 Muslim Holocaust & Muslim Genocide””, Countercurrents, 17 July 2020: https://countercurrents.org/2020/07/racist-mainstream-ignores-us-imposed-post-9-11-muslim-holocaust-muslim-genocide/  .

[13]. Gideon Polya, “Paris Atrocity Context: 27 Million Muslim Avoidable  Deaths From Imposed Deprivation In 20 Countries Violated By US Alliance Since 9-11”, Countercurrents, 22 November, 2015: http://www.countercurrents.org/polya221115.htm ) ;

[14]. “Experts: US did 9-11”: https://sites.google.com/site/expertsusdid911/ .

[15]. Charles Lewis, “25 years, countless investigations and 935 lies”, Center for Public Integrity, 25 June 2014: https://publicintegrity.org/inside-publici/25-years-countless-investigations-and-935-lies/ .

[16]. Charles Lewis, “935 Lies: the future of truth and the decline of America’s moral integrity”, Public Affairs, 24 June 2014.

[17]. I.F. Stone, quoted in “Two words – governments lie. Iraqi oil, climate change and Tony Blair”, Media Lens, 22 January 2003: http://www.medialens.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=239:two-words-governments-lie-iraq-oil-climate-change-and-tony-blair&catid=17:alerts-2003&Itemid=42 .

[18]. Gore Vidal interviewed by Melvyn Bragg on the South Bank Show”, 2008: http://warincontext.org/2012/08/01/remembering-gore-vidal-change-is-the-nature-of-life-and-its-hope/ .

[19]. Steven Jones, Robert Korol, Anthony Szamboti, and Ted Walter, “15 years later: on the physics  of high-rise building collapses”, Euro Physics News, 2016: https://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/epn/pdf/2016/04/epn2016474p21.pdf .

[20]. John Kaminsky, “9/11 was a hoax. The American Government killed its own people”, Serendipity: https://www.serendipity.li/wot/911_a_hoax.htm .

[21]. Gideon Polya, “Exposure Of  Neocon American And Zionist Imperialist 9-11 Deception”, Countercurrents,  8 September, 2012: https://countercurrents.org/polya080912.htm .

[22]. Elias Davidsson, “There is no evidence that Muslims committed the crime of 9-11”,  Op Ed News, 10 January 2008: http://www.opednews.com/articles/1/There-is-no-evidence-that-by-Elias-Davidsson-100811-366.html .

[23].  Elias Davidsson, “Hijacking America ‘s Mind on 9/11. Counterfeiting Evidence”, Algora, New York 2013, 328 pp: http://www.amazon.com/Hijacking-Americas-Mind-11-Counterfeiting/dp/0875869734 .

[24]. David Ray Griffin, “The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report about 9/11 is Unscientific and False”, Olive Branch Press, 2012: https://www.amazon.com.au/Mysterious-Collapse-World-Trade-Center-ebook/dp/B00APDAZZ2 .

[25]. 911Truth.org, “The 40 top reasons to doubt the official story”, 911Truth.org, 16 May 2006: http://www.911truth.org/the-top-40-reasons-to-doubt-the-offical-story/ .

[26]. Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen, “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, The Open Chemical Physics Journals, vol.2,    pp.7-31 (25), 2009: http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM .

[27]. Barbara Kingsolver, “The Lacuna”, Faber & Faber, London, 2009, part 3, p159.

[28]. “Mainstream media lying”: https://sites.google.com/site/mainstreammedialying/home .

[29]. “Lying by omission”, Mainstream media lying: https://sites.google.com/site/mainstreammedialying/lying-by-omission .

[30]. Gideon Polya, “Mainstream media: fake news through lying by omission”, MWC News, 1 April 2017: https://sites.google.com/site/mainstreammedialying/2017-04-01 .

[31]. “Mainstream media censorship”: https://sites.google.com/site/mainstreammediacensorship/home .

[32]. Paul Craig Roberts, “9/11: finally the truth comes out?”, Foreign Policy Journal, 4 January 2019: https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2019/01/04/9-11-finally-the-truth-comes-out/ .

Dr Gideon Polya taught science students at La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia for 4 decades. He published some 130 works in a 5 decade scientific career, including  a huge pharmacological reference text “Biochemical Targets of Plant Bioactive Compounds” (CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, New York & London , 2003). He has published “Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950” (G.M. Polya, Melbourne, 2007: http://globalbodycount.blogspot.com/  ); see also his contributions “Australian complicity in Iraq mass mortality” in “Lies, Deep Fries & Statistics” (edited by Robyn Williams, ABC Books, Sydney, 2007: http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/ockhamsrazor/australian-complicity-in-iraq-mass-mortality/3369002#transcript   ) and “Ongoing Palestinian Genocide” in “The Plight of the Palestinians (edited by William Cook, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2010: https://countercurrents.org/polya170612.htm ). He has published a revised and updated 2008 version of his 1998 book “Jane Austen and the Black Hole of British History” (see: http://janeaustenand.blogspot.com/  ) as biofuel-, globalization- and climate-driven global food price increases threaten a greater famine catastrophe than the man-made famine in British-ruled India that killed 6-7 million Indians in the “forgotten” World War 2 Bengal Famine (see the BBC broadcast involving Dr Polya, Economics Nobel Laureate Professor Amartya Sen and others: http://www.open.edu/openlearn/history-the-arts/history/social-economic-history/listen-the-bengal-famine  ;  Gideon Polya: https://sites.google.com/site/drgideonpolya/home  ; and  Gideon Polya Writing: https://sites.google.com/site/gideonpolyawriting/ ).  He has recently published Gideon Polya, “US-imposed Post-9-11 Muslim Holocaust & Muslim Genocide”, Korsgaard Publishing, Germany, 2020 (for details see: https://korsgaardpublishing.com/portfolio/23945/ ).When words fail one can say it in pictures – for images of Gideon Polya’s huge paintings for the Planet, Peace, Mother and Child see: http://sites.google.com/site/artforpeaceplanetmotherchild/ and http://www.flickr.com/photos/gideonpolya/  .


SIGN UP FOR COUNTERCURRENTS DAILY NEWSLETTER


 

Comments are closed.