As the World Heats Up, FERC Cools Regulations

climate change

For the past 10 years a group of resolute environmental activists from Beyond Extreme Energy, Third Act and others have been attending and protesting at the monthly public meetings of FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission). Each month the climate change activists stand vigilant outside the Commissions FERC headquarters building before each meeting, protesting, picketing and greeting attendees, calling their attention to concerns and informing passersby on how the commissions decisions exacerbate the global climate crisis.

FERC is tasked with approving and regulating the interstate delivery of natural gas, oil, hydroelectricity and electrical energy along with the safety and environmental impact of this critical infrastructure.

This month’s meeting is significant in that it is the last under the Biden administration. Trump, who has called for more fossil fuel development with his “Drill baby drill” mantra, is expected to embrace Project 2025’s realignment regarding FERC. The coal, nuclear and natural gas-heavy proposals contained in the paper boldly state there is a need to “ Refocus FERC on ensuring that customers have affordable and reliable electricity, natural gas, and oil and no longer allow it to favor special interests and progressive causes.”

One of the architects of the DOE and EPA portion of Project 2025 was former Trump appointee and DOE official, Bernard McNamee, and former chairman of the conservative Texas Public Policy Foundation, a Texas think tank, that has fought climate regulations. Interestingly too, the commission operates on a $565 million budget (2025) which it states is recovered in full “through annual charges and filing fees assessed on the industries it regulates.”

The commission’s monthly public meetings have been “ground zero” for activists in speaking out through attempting to disrupt the proceedings when voicing their concerns for the profound consequences and negative environmental impact of carbon-based fossil fuels. Once a person has been removed for disruption, they are banned for life in attending another meeting and are instead relegated to being escorted to an overspill room where they can watch the proceedings on a TV monitor. After the start of today’s meeting, the group of seven activists began chanting loudly in the hallway when they were ushered out of the building by armed guards.

Even without activists speaking out, the necessity of reducing climate change vectors was widely apparent this past week as fires consumed a substantial portion of Southern California due to the human-caused climate crisis. This overt display of destruction on such a massive scale alone should prompt the Commission to reexamine its role by taking positive and immediate action when regulating and approving energy projects that contribute to the indisputable evidence of the growing climate emergency.

Mainstream news coverage has failed, too, in its role of informing the public regarding the contributing conditions that have led up to the California fires by sidelining the subject. Instead, they have focused on the personal human tragedy for those who have suffered from its devastating effects.

According to NASA, global temperatures in 2024 reached a new “unprecedented heat streak” making it the warmest year on record since record keeping began in 1880, toppling the previous record set in 2023. It just may have been “the hottest year in human history” is how the Economist referenced the upward record-breaking trend.

Climate change, too, is reflective in “100-year floods” now occurring with greater frequency and predicted to occur annually by the end of this century in many coastal communities as reported by the American Geophysical Union in 2023.


Demonstrators, today, pointed out that FERC staff and commissioners should follow the US District DC Court of Appeals decisions, telling them to “develop robust environmental justice and greenhouse gas emissions analysis of proposed new projects.” Last year, the court vacated two LNG (liquid natural gas) export facilities due to FERC’s “inadequate environmental assessments and the need for a more thorough analysis of climate and community impacts.”

The activists summed up the commission’s review process as being a “rubber stamp” for proposed projects and that the commission seldom reviews a project that it does not like.

Thinking forward, they admittedly would rather see FERC changed to FREC (Federal Renewable Energy Commission).

Report and photo by Phil Pasquini

© 2025 nuzeink all rights reserved worldwide

Support Countercurrents

Countercurrents is answerable only to our readers. Support honest journalism because we have no PLANET B.
Become a Patron at Patreon

Join Our Newsletter

GET COUNTERCURRENTS DAILY NEWSLETTER STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX

Join our WhatsApp and Telegram Channels

Get CounterCurrents updates on our WhatsApp and Telegram Channels

Related Posts

Climate Politics: What Would Donald Trump Do?

Recent scientific data shows that global temperatures exceeded 1.5 degrees Celsius (above pre-industrial levels) for the first time. Dr. James Hansen, the godfather of the modern-day climate movement, believes the global rise…

Killing The Great Barrier Reef

The Great Barrier Reef has been seriously damaged by too much ocean heat. According to University of Sydney: The damage is at catastrophic levels. And as stated by the National…

Join Our Newsletter


Annual Subscription

Join Countercurrents Annual Fund Raising Campaign and help us

Latest News