Nomi
Klein On "Disaster Capitalism"
By Thomas Riggins
26 September, 2007
Countercurrents.org
This
article is a review of Naomi Klein’s important article in the
October 2007 issue of Harper’s Magazine (“Disaster Capitalism:
The new economy of catastrophe”) based on her new book, The Shock
Doctrine.
A major theme in this article
is the analogy between the effects of war and of “natural”
disasters on people and the environment. The contrast between the Green
Zone in Iraq (a safe haven) and the Red Zone (the rest of Iraq) is analogized
with the aftermath of Katrina and the difference between the areas of
New Orleans inhabited by the rich (reconstructed and prospering) and
the poor (neglected and festering).
Just as areas of Iraq outside
the Green Zone have been destroyed and the people brutalized by Bush’s
war, so have many areas throughout the world faced the same type of
treatment and the people have seen their regions “demolished by
ideology, the war on ‘big government’, the religion of tax
cuts, [and] the fetish for privatization.”
In many areas of the Third
World infrastructure (what little there is) is failing under the assault
of the philosophy of “free trade.” Klein gives as an example
the failure of the sewer system in Jakarta (capital of Indonesia). Earlier
this year, 57 people died and half the city was inundated by raw sewage.
This was due to policies that cut back on public investment and social
spending in order to enrich the private sector.
The same is happening here
in the US. The bridge collapse in Minneapolis, the subway flooding in
New York, all due to the neglect of the public sphere so that tax cuts
and incentives can be dished out to the private sector. Klein points
out that The American Society of Civil Engineers states that the US
public infrastructure (“roads, bridges, schools, dams”)
has been neglected to such an extent that it would five years and 1.5
trillion dollars just to get it back up to standard.
This is the background for
the development of “disaster capitalism.” Ms Klein writes:
“Every time a new crisis hits-- even when the crisis itself is
the direct by-product of free-market ideology-- the fear and disorientation
that follow are harnessed for radical social and economic re-engineering.”
That is to say, the ruling class is using disasters, both natural and
those brought about by their polices, to ram through social structural
changes in their interests that they never could have brought about
using the democratic process. Getting rid of public housing for the
poor in New Orleans, for example.
What is happening is that
private corporations are rushing to take over the role of disaster relief
and reconstruction and make super profits as a result. They are aided
and abetted by those politicians who push the ideology of free market
capitalism and slam as “socialism” any measures by the public
sector to solve social problems. It is quite instructive, in this regard,
to compare Alan Greenspan’s rapturous description of the wonders
of the free market in his book The Age of Turbulence, with what Naomi
Klein has found on the ground in her travels around the world.
Klein sees the development
of disaster capitalism as an evolution and extension of the older concept
of “the industrial-mililtary complex” that President Eisenhower
spoke of back in 1961 [originally “the industrial-military-congressional
complex” because Ike knew the US Congress was a completely corrupt
and complicit equal component of this complex -- as it still is-- but
he allowed his speech writers to delete “congressional”
to keep the illusions of bourgeois democracy alive for that fraction
of the population that still voted].
This new "disaster-capitalism
complex" she describes as one "in which all conflict - and
disaster - related functions (waging war, securing borders, spying on
citizens, rebuilding cities, treating traumatized soldiers) can be performed
by corporations at a profit."
What has happened is that
a state within a state has been created-- a virtual corporate run state
that now carries out many of the functions that the state represented
by the US government used to perform. The Bush administration, for example,
gave out 3.4 billion dollars in no bid contracts to its corporate buddies
to rebuild after Katrina. E.g., Blackwater provides guards for FEMA
operations for $950 a day per guard!
Its all our tax payer money
that goes to fund these corporate crooks. The "shadow state,"
Klein writes, "has been built almost exclusively with public resources...
and is all privately owned and controlled." This is how the famous
free market works-- it simply loots the public sector for its profits.
This new disaster capitalist
market now, Klein says, has to be protected. That means NGOs, charities,
and government entities are seen as potential enemies and rivals by
the new corporate state. For example the mercenary providers, firms
such as Blackwater, are looking for bigger and better contracts. They
now say "they are better equipped than the UN to engage in peacekeeping
in Darfur." Just give them a big for profit contract and the African
Union troops can stay home.
And it is not just Dafur.
Klein quotes a Lockheed Martin representative about the contracting
out of the police and fire departments of American towns and cities
to private firms: "What they do for the military in downtown Fallujah
[leave as a pile of rubble?--TR] they can do for the police in downtown
Reno."
And if this isn't bad enough,
Klein gives us a quote from Fast Company magazine on the results of
the "War on Terror" [the unleashing of the US military as
a result of the fluke 9/11 attack]. The "end result" will
be "a new more resilient approach to national security, one built
not around the state but around private citizens and companies ....
Security will become a function of where you live and whom you work
for, much as health care is allocated already."
This is another major theme
of Klein's article. That the country is turning into a domestic copy
of the Iraqi Green Zone. There will be gated and protected areas with
state of the art schools, hospitals, police and fire protection, nice
housing, etc. areas walled off from the rest of the common lower class
herd of Americans, and all run by private companies.
We can see this trend in
New Orleans today, Klein writes. Gated communities for the well off
(mostly white) protected by private security forces, and FEMA villages:
"desolate, out-of-the-way trailer camps for low-income evacuees,
built by Bechtel or Fluor subcontractors and administered by private
security companies that patrolled the gravel lots, restricted visitors,
kept journalists out, and treated survivors like criminals."
An ominous new factor to
note is, that heretofore terrorist attacks and national disasters used
to send the stock market down. Now they make it jump up. The new disaster
capitalists stand to make fortunes out of the human misery of these
disasters now that the government just turns over no bid contracts for
them to do the follow up. And they don't even have to do the work. There
is little or no supervision or accountability. Any problems with poor
results are explained away by the corporations and taken at face value
by the Bush administration.
What used to be a "truism"
of capitalist dogma, Klein says, is no longer so: namely, "that
you couldn't have booming economic growth in the midst of violence and
instability." At least for some parts of the economy and for the
biggest corporations in the stocks representing aerospace, defense and
homeland security, and, of course oil and gas just the opposite is the
case. "The oil and gas industry," Klein says, "is so
intimately entwined with the economy of disaster -- both as a root cause
behind many disasters and as beneficiary from them -- that it deserves
to be treated as an honorary adjunct of the disaster-capitalism complex."
It is important to note the
relationship between the disaster capitalists and, Klein points out,
"elite opinion makers." Not only do they have many members
of Congress in their pockets (from both parties), but also many areas
of the mass media is under their control and they fund "think tanks"
to churn out propaganda in their interests (especially the National
Institute for Public Policy and the Center for Security Policy).
So, Daddy Warbucks is alive
and well. We can expect the US, I think, to bomb Iran for no other reason
than to have an excuse to spend public money on corporations to sell
the government the bombs and other weapons. Wars and disasters are ends
in themselves-- an excuse to enrich the industrial- military complex
[AKA disaster capitalism].
Wouldn't it be interesting
if the Bushites were in Iraq not to "win" but simply to destroy
as much as they could of both our own resources, human and material,
and the Iraqi's, just so they could justify the transfer of billions,
if not trillions, of dollars from the public funds of the US to the
corporate allies of the Bush administration.
After all many, if not most,
of the Pentagon big shots, after retirement, end up making real money
on the boards of disaster capitalist companies. In any case, Iraq is
a "win win" situation. Win, and you get the oil. Lose and
you get to enrich the corporations anyway by all the expenditures. And,
if Exxon can't have the oil, selling it for $80 a barrel is a good consolation.
Thomas Riggins
is the book review editor of Political Affairs magazine and can be reached
at [email protected]
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights
Comment
Policy
Digg
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.