Who
Are The Fanatics?
By Paul Craig Roberts
10 September, 2007
Countercurrents.org
President
Jimmy Carter was demonized for pointing out in his book, Palestine:
Peace Not Apartheid, that there are actually two sides to the Israeli-Palestinian
issue. Distinguished American scholars, such as John Mearsheimer and
Stephen Walt have suffered the same fate for documenting the excessive
influence the Israel Lobby has on US foreign policy.
Americans would be astonished
at the criticisms in the Israeli press of the Israeli government’s
policies toward the Palestinians and Arabs generally. In Israel facts
are still part of the discussion. If the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz,
could replace Fox “News,” CNN, New York Times and Washington
Post, Americans would know the truth about US and Israeli policies in
the Middle East and their likely consequences.
On September 1, Haaretz reported
that Rabbi Eric Yoffie, the president of the Union for Reform Judaism,
which represents 900 Congregations and 1.5 million Jews, “accused
American media, politicians and religious groups of demonizing Islam”
and turning Muslims into “satanic figures.”
Rabbi Yoffie is certainly
correct. In America there is only one side to the issue. An entire industry
has been created that is devoted to demonizing Islam. Books abound that
misrepresent Islam as the greatest possible threat to Western Civilization
and seek to instill fear and hatred of Muslims in Americans. For example,
Norman Podhoretz proclaims “World War IV: The Long Struggle Against
Islamofascism.” Daniel Pipes shrieks that “Militant Islam
Reaches America.” Lee Harris warns of “The Suicide of Reason:
Radical Islam’s Threat to the West.”
Think tanks have well-funded
Middle East programs, the purpose of which is to spread Islamophobia.
Fear and loathing pour out of the Middle East Forum and the American
Enterprise Institute.
In the US it is acceptable,
even obligatory in many circles, to hate Muslims and to support violence
against them. Pipes has been described as a “leading anti-Muslim
hate propagandist.” He is on record advocating the use of violence
alone as the solution to the Muslim problem. This won him the endorsement
of the Christian Coalition, AIPAC, and the Zionist Organization of America
for appointment to the board of the United States Institute of Peace.
President George Bush used a recess appointment to appoint this man
of violence to the Institute of Peace. Pipes advocates that the Muslims
be beaten into submission by force, the view that has guided the Bush
administration.To brainwashed and propagandized Americans, Pipes appointment
made perfect sense.
Podhoretz believes that Islam
has no right to exist, because it is opposed to Israeli territorial
expansion, and that America must deracinate Islam, which means to tear
Islam up by the roots.
While neoconservatives, Christian
Zionists, and the Bush administration embrace unbridled violence against
Muslims, Lee Harris warns that America is much too tolerant and reasonable
to be able to defend itself against Muslim fanaticism. America’s
“governing philosophy based on reason, tolerance, consensus and
deliberation cannot defend itself against a [Muslim] strategy of ruthless
violence.”
Islamophobia overflows with
such absurdities and contradictions. Harris tells us that the Enlightenment
overcame fanatical thinking in the West, leaving the West unfamiliar
with fanaticism and helpless to confront it. Harris, who fancies himself
an authority on fanaticism, is deaf, dumb, and blind to Communism and
National Socialism and is completely ignorant of the fact that neoconservative
fanatics are the direct heirs of the Jacobins of the French Revolution,
itself a fanatical product of the Enlightenment.
If Americans did rely on
reason, tolerance and deliberation, they might free their minds of shrill
propaganda long enough to consider the “Muslim threat.”
Muslims are disunited. Their disunity makes them a threat to one another,
not to the West.
In Iraq most of the fighting
and violence is between Sunni and Shi’ite Arabs and between Sunnis
and Kurds. If Iraqis were unified, most of the violence, instead of
a small part of it, would be directed against the American troops, and
the remnants of a US defeated army would have been withdrawn by now.
However much Iraqis might hate the American invader and occupier, they
do not hate him enough to unite and to drive him out. They had rather
kill one another.
Iran, the current focus of
demonization, is not Arab. Iranians are the ancient race of Persians.
Indeed, Iran would do itself a favor if it changed its name back to
Persia. For eight years (1980-1988) the Iranians and Iraqis were locked
in catastrophic war with horrendous casualties on both sides. Despite
its military exhaustion, Iraq was considered a “threat”
by the American Superpower and was bombed and embargoed for the decade
of the 1990s, one consequence of which was 500,000 deaths of Iraqi children.
Not content with the complete
crippling of Iraq by the Clinton administration, the Bush administration
invaded Iraq in 2003 and has been dealing more death and destruction
to Iraq ever since.
Palestine has been under
Israeli occupation for decades. Israel has simply stolen most of Palestine,
and the remaining Palestinian enclaves are ghettos policed by the Israeli
army.
The rulers of Saudi Arabia
and the oil emirates are Sunni Arabs. They are more afraid of Shi’ite
Arabs than of Israelis. Egypt, Jordan, and Pakistan are ruled by bought-and-paid-for
American puppets. The Turkish military is also in the American pocket
and suppresses any Islamist influence in the civilian government.
Afghanistan is a disunited
country of tribal peoples, each holding sway in their area. The Taliban
were attempting to unify Afghanistan, and the Bush administration’s
fear that the Taliban might succeed was the reason for the US invasion
of Afghanistan. The US allied with the defeated Northern Alliance, in
part a remnant of the old Soviet puppet government, and turned Afghanistan
back over to warlords.
When the facts are considered--Muslim
disunity and the absence of modern technology, navies, and strategic
reach--the Bush/Cheney/ neoconservative/Zionist propaganda that “we
must fight them over there before they come over here” is such
a transparent hoax that it is astounding that so many Americans have
fallen for it.
To the extent that there
is any Muslim threat, it is one created by the US and Israel. Israel
has no diplomacy toward Muslims and relies on violence and coercion.
The US has interfered in the internal affairs of Muslim countries during
the entire post World War II period. The US overthrew an elected government
in Iran and installed the Shah. The US backed Saddam Hussein in his
aggression against Iran. The US has kept in power rulers it could control
and has pandered to the desires of Israeli governments. If America is
hated, America created the hate by its arrogant and dismissive treatment
of the Muslim Middle East.
There is no such thing as
Islamofascism. This is a coined propaganda word used to inflame the
ignorant. There is no factual basis for the hatred that neoconservative
Islamophobes instill in Americans. God did not tell America to destroy
the Muslims for the Israelis.
In America today blind ignorant
hate against Muslims has been brought to a boiling point. The fear and
loathing is so great that the American public and its elected representatives
in Congress offer scant opposition to the Bush administration’s
plan to make Iran the third Middle East victim of American aggression
in the 21st century.
Most Americans, who Harris
believes to be so reasonable, tolerant, and deliberative that they cannot
defend themselves, could not care less that one million Iraqis have
lost their lives during the American occupation and that an estimated
four million Iraqis have been displaced. The total of dead and displaced
comes to 20 percent of the Iraqi population. If this is not fanaticism
on the part of the Bush administration, what is it? Certainly it is
not reason, tolerance, and deliberation.
The Bush supporter will ask,
“What about 9/11?” Even those who believe the fraudulent
9/11 Commission Report should understand that in the official account
the attack was the work of individuals, none of whom were acting on
behalf of Muslim governments and none of whom were Iraqi, Afghan, or
Iranian. 9/11 provides no justification for attacking Muslim countries.
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant
Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was Associate
Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor
of National Review. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions.
Leave
A Comment
&
Share Your Insights
Comment
Policy
Digg
it! And spread the word!
Here is a unique chance to help this article to be read by thousands
of people more. You just Digg it, and it will appear in the home page
of Digg.com and thousands more will read it. Digg is nothing but an
vote, the article with most votes will go to the top of the page. So,
as you read just give a digg and help thousands more to read this article.