Day 64 of Kashmir shut down. One more youth died of pellet firing. A 23-year-old was killed in forces action in Batengoo village of south Kashmir’s Anantnag district on Saturday, taking the overall death toll in the current uprising to 78. The deceased has been identified as Yawar Ahmad, son of Mushtaq Ahmad.

Medical Superintendent District Hospital Anantnag Dr Majeed Mehrab said: “The youth had suffered pellet injuries in his chest and abdomen. He was declared dead on arrival.”

Earlier, a 25-year-old youth died after suffering a head injury during clashes in Tukroo village of Shopian in south Kashmir on Saturday.

The youth, identified as Sayar Ahmad Sheikh, son of Shameem Ahmad Sheikh, a resident of Ganawpora Shopian was declared dead on arrival at PHC Rajpora, said a doctor.

A police official confirmed the killing, saying Sayar was hit by a teargas shell.

Meanwhile, minister of State for External Affairs V.K. Singh, also a former Indian Army chief, on Saturday described pellet firing as non-lethal and said it was a “sensible and well-thought” decision by the Union Home Ministry to use the weapon for controlling protesting crowds in the Kashmir Valley. However, pellet firings have caused at least six deaths. Hundreds of civilians, including minors, have lost their eyesight partially or fully after they were hit by pellets in the restive valley.

Countercurrents is answerable only to our readers. Support honest journalism because we have no PLANET B. Become a Patron at Patreon Subscribe to our Telegram channel




  1. K SHESHU BABU says:

    It is strange how pallets are being considered ‘ non- lethal’ even after so many dying due to injuries. Despite many activists and even court advising not to use the pallets, army has not stopped using them. Injuries are becoming a routine and many deaths are being reported due to pallet injuries.

  2. K SHESHU BABU says:

    Considering pallets as non – lethal indicates the rulers callous attitude towards injuries and deaths due to use of the pallets.

    • salahudidn says:

      no it is callous attitude towards kashmir itself ….why dont they use in other areas of insurgency