Election Commission asleep as Modi incites hate in Jharkhand

Modi cmpaign jharkhand

A delegation from Loktantra Bachao 2024 campaign met Jharkhand’s Chief Election Officer K Ravi Kumar today, to submit a complaint against Prime Minister Narendra Modi for violating the Model Code of Conduct as well as the Representation of People Act in recent speeches he made in Jharkhand.  Even though the complaint documented all the instances of inflammatory and communal comments made by the PM and also the specific sections of the MCC and RP Act that were violated, the CEO showed no sign that he might act on this complaint.

Addressing election rallies in Chaibasa, Palamau and Gumla on 3-4 May respectively, Prime Minister and BPJ star campaigner Narendra Modi misled the public with fabricated facts to the effect that the Congress Party was planning to rob Adivasis and other communities of their property and give it to Muslims, using derogatory terms such as ‘infiltrators’ and ‘vote jihad’. He further misled people by saying that the Congress Party would take away reservation quota of Adivasis, Dalits and OBCs and give it to Muslims.


These fabricated and inflammatory statements are clearly aimed at creating a fear of Muslims among many voters and make them look to the BJP for protection. They violate the first clause of the Code of Conduct, which prohibits all parties and candidates from indulging “in any activity which may aggravate existing differences or create mutual hatred or cause tension between different castes and communities, religious or linguistic”.

These and other recent statements of the Prime Minister in Jharkhand also violate Section 3(A) of the Representation of People Act, which prohibits any candidate from attempting to “promote, feelings of enmity or hatred between different classes of the citizens of India on grounds of religion, race, caste, community, or language”. Further details of his statements and how they infringe on the law are given in the attached complaint, submitted to the CEO.

It may be recalled that the Supreme Court, in the “ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.” (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 943/2021) case, has called for suo motu filing of FIRs against hate speech under IPC sections 153A, 153B, 295A and 506.

Delegation

As the delegation attempted to explain to the CEO, these communal statements are especially dangerous coming from the Prime Minister, who sets the tone for others. Already, there have been many other speeches of this nature from BJP leaders in recent days. The poison is spreading fast.

The CEO, unfortunately, did not show any interest in this complaint, nor did he engage with the delegation. When the delegates pressed him on what he intended to do, he simply said that the “rules” would need to be studied, inquiry would have to be made and the complaint would have to be forwarded to the Election Commission of India. When the delegation asked the CEO what action would be taken to check such inflammatory and communal speech in the coming days, he remained non-committal.

The delegation comprised Elina Horo, Jean Drèze, Siraj Dutta and Tom Kavla.

Support Countercurrents

Countercurrents is answerable only to our readers. Support honest journalism because we have no PLANET B.
Become a Patron at Patreon

Join Our Newsletter

GET COUNTERCURRENTS DAILY NEWSLETTER STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX

Join our WhatsApp and Telegram Channels

Get CounterCurrents updates on our WhatsApp and Telegram Channels

Related Posts

Faizabad & Indian Secularism!

If Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had not the lost the parliamentary seat of Faizabad in Uttar Pradesh (UP), where the Ram Mandir is situated, would the Indian elites, intellectuals, critics…

Join Our Newsletter


Annual Subscription

Join Countercurrents Annual Fund Raising Campaign and help us

Latest News