Modi 3 :Majoritarianism Normalised ?


“The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.”

– Gramsci

A journalist friends’ prophesy has finally come true.

The day India launched ‘surgical strikes’ across the border supposedly to avenge the Pulwama terror attack, this friend immediately sent a message on a whatsapp group that Modi has ensured himself a second term. He stood his ground despite few heated exchanges on the group from left leaning friends.

Coming days, this not so expected debacle of the secular camp and the surge of Hindutva Supremacist camp in newer areas and communities would be further analysed/debated/discussed from various angles. It will be debated why despite the caution expressed by the likes of AmartyaSen who had concluded how India has taken “a Quantum jump in wrong direction since 2014”; how despite being cautioned by leading scholars, intellectuals, scientists of our times that the  very idea of India is at stake in the elections, the people in general did not pay any heed to their appeals and have resolved to continue the journey with a renewed frenzy in the same direction or have fully supposedly embraced this idea of New India jettisoning the old one. Remember not only BJP has been able to garner more seats than last time but its vote share has also increased more than five percent.

No doubt the results have shocked many but the signs were ominous with new factors at play and new players in power and with the ‘project to radicalise Hindu India’ by design and delusion gaining further momentum.’ (

People will also try to analyse how far the elections were influenced and impacted by the rapid spread of social media especially ‘Whatsapp’ in India, ( which have helped rapid spread of right wing ideas and exclucivist agendas much to the detriment of voices of moderation and inclusion. (

Anyone who had looked at the pre and post poll surveys done by more professional institutions – say the CSDS Lokniti survey – it was amply clear that how the winds were blowing. How there was less traction for the issues of farmer distress, unemployment, rise in prices etc and growing traction for issues of security, nationalism, Balakot etc. and how the election ‘may have been driven by personality, at least partially’ ( And this despite the fact that even members of PM Modi’s think tank had themselves acknowledged the ‘crisis Shadow On India’s Economy’ and how it is ‘[r]unning the risk of a structural crisis, and could soon be ensnared in a “middle-income trap”‘. (

Question arises what prompted this less traction for real livelihood issues and a surge for issues of passion, issues of emotions ? Why this huge gap between the promise and the performance as well as the rhetoric and the reality did not worry the populace.

As an aside it can be shared that the coarse sounding discourse from the ruling dispensation, vis-a-vis the ‘arch rival’  ( GharmeinGhuskar Mara) or the casual manner in which use of nuclear weapons found mention, must have found a deep resonance in the citizenry which has been bred on Pakistan betting – which it equates with nationalism.

It is true that not only Congress but other political formations like the SP, BSP, NCP, Trinamool, Left etc will have to do a lot of soul searching to understand why they collectively failed to stop the Modi juggernaut and how they need to strategise in coming months so that the idea of Hindutva which – to paraphrase a famous revolutionary – which has become a material force since it has been gripped by the masses – could be challenged effectively.

The plight of the entire ‘secular camp’ can be described by a simple fact. It will be the second consecutive term of the parliament when there would be no ‘leader of opposition’ ( which demands that at least the largest opposition party should get at least ten per cent of the total seats)

Few aspects of this verdict will have important ramifications for democracy’s onward journey for decades together in this part of South Asia.

  • It appears that majoritarianism – rule by majority – which sounds very similar to democracy but which essentially stands democracy on its head, which made a powerful entry last elections, would be normalised here.

  • Silencing and further invisibilising of religious minorities would be its logical outcome.

  • The 2019 elections which was fought around the image of Modi – which was a continuation of the 2014 experiment – have inadverentently or so ushered this parliamentary system in a presidential form

  • This development where personalities take centre stage will severly impact the whole idea of party organisation and the tedious process of building it.

  • BJP, the ruling party at the moment – which had tried to project a collective leadership of sorts – also finds itself at a cusp of great change,  which would now grow more in the shadow of the personality cult of PM Modi.

The tremendous challenge which awaits the seculars could be gleaned from what Prof SuhasPalshikar had to say about this ascendance of BJP in India. According to him it has definitely contributed to what is being seen as ‘[e]mergence of a new ideological framework to India’s democracy and public life in general’ and ‘politics of crafting a new hegemony’ is underway. ( EPW, August 18, 2018, Vol LIII, No 33, Towards Hegemony – BJP beyond Electoral Dominance)

Elaborating further he had discussed how the “second dominant party system” – represented by the BJP, is more than a mere party system; it is a moment of the rise of a new set of dominant ideas and sensibilities’ that have provided ideological sustenance to the dominant party system. For him this ’emergence of new politics’ is ‘going to be a blend of new Hindutva and the political economy of a new variety.’ThisHindutva asks its followers ‘to become Hindu politically’ and become “religous Hindu” by way of public manifestation of religiosity and conflation between nationalis and Hindutva is the ‘backbone of the new ideological dominance’.  This ideological stand not only helps it in ensuring “anti-BJP” would not only be equated with “anti-national” but also helps it attract new recruits for whom ‘being a staunch Hindu becomes a vehicle that expresses their nationalism’. He also discusses how it has been possible to weave together ideas of Hindutva and development with nationalism  turning them into arsenal of ‘political and ideological offensive’. Underlining the utility of “separate yet connected” network of affiliated organisations of RSS,  which has helped it push further the ideological battle, it also tells us how this ‘new hegemony may usher in a new “normal” as far as our collective imagination of what democracy means and what it should do is concerned.

This craving for establishing hegemony has always been one of Hindutva’s long cherished ambitions. RSS – the self proclaimed ‘cultural organisation’ which is the key figure in all these transformations in tandem with plethora of its affiliated organisations – has always described itself not as Samaj me Sangathan( Organisation in Society) but as SamajkaSangathan ( Organisation of Society).

And before one envisages, brainstorms around counter strategies to challenge the hegemony, it would be rather apt to brood over a query posed by an incisive documentary titled ‘Azmaish: A Journey Through the Subcontinent’ made by a promising Pakistani filmmaker. The documentary tried to understand whether after 70 years after partition: is India, like Pakistan, turning to religious extremism? It had looked at retreat from liberal democracy on both sides of the border.

For any independent observer while Pakistan’s slow metamorphosis into a Islamic country is well documented and fairly well understood, India’s changing of colour has been a recent phenomenon which still baffles many. How and why does a country which refused to have religion as basis of nationhood despite a bloody partition which saw deaths of around two million people died and forcible displacemet of 10-12 million and which had robust leadership with firm committment to secularism to handle the post independent challenges, is slowly on the way to look like its ‘arch rival’. Whether this type of journey is unique to a country like India, which was under colonial regime, where a largely secular nationalist movement led its struggle for independence or one can see similar examples in other ex-colonies where similar non- religious/secular leadership led its struggle against colonial bondage.

Could it be seen as part of the burgeoining of far right the world over where a far right party, the BJP “[h]old governmental power on its own.” with a specific history unlike any other country where the far right, “with obvious fascist characteristics, that has existed now for over 90 years” ( which involves the rise and spread of neoliberalism with obvious devastating consequences, leading to ‘new and more powerful forms of social disorientation and alienation’ and people rushing to “seek psychological refuge in clinging to ‘unchangeable’ ascribed identities of ethnicity, religion, race, caste and nation, either separately or in combination.”.

Subhash Gatade is the author of Pahad Se Uncha Aadmi (2010) Godse’s Children: Hindutva Terror in India,(2011) and The Saffron Condition: The Politics of Repression and Exclusion in Neoliberal India(2011). He is also the Convener of New Socialist Initiative (NSI) Email : [email protected]


Join Our News Letter



Support Countercurrents

Countercurrents is answerable only to our readers. Support honest journalism because we have no PLANET B.
Become a Patron at Patreon

Join Our Newsletter


Join our WhatsApp and Telegram Channels

Get CounterCurrents updates on our WhatsApp and Telegram Channels

Related Posts

Join Our Newsletter

Annual Subscription

Join Countercurrents Annual Fund Raising Campaign and help us

Latest News